What are you talking about? He came to the club as a Centre. He played over Russell later in the year. Ryles even dropped Kelly early in the year and brought Samrani in before he himself got hurt. As soon as he was fit, he was back in.
If we get Best for 2027 for example, Samrani wont start. Simple as that. Not because we don't view him as a Centre, it is due to having a better option.
Yep. Samrani far outplayed Russell at centre in attack, though his defence wasn't as good. But also, guaranteed starters would get pai a fair bit more than fringe first graders, who get paid more than backups. If we already have Penisini on the books for 2028 and we are looking at signing Best, then the only offer we can make to Samrani is for a fringe first grader. It makes sense that he would be looking for a top 17 spot somewhere before accepting a lesser offer to stay at Parra.
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin > Poupou EscobarNovember 1, 2026 at 5:45pm
If Samrani was a centre he should be absolutely cutting up these Frenchman. From what I've seen in this world cup., he couldn't cut a Devon sandwich
I don't think you are understanding what we are saying. You are saying he's not a Centre just a fill in due to injuries. He played from Harold Matt's all the way to NRL as a Centre.
Will he be better edge? Yes I agree, but saying "he only played Centre due to injuries" is false as the staff see him as a Centre as did all his coaches before that.
He has played only Centre in his entire career. As a junior at Cronulla and a Cup player at Canterbury he was a Centre.
Whether the game itself demands him to play another position or not, he is a Centre until further notice. Therefore, when comes to Round 1, incase of another signing, Samrani will be starting Centre. Now our pursuit of Best shows we want an upgrade, until then Samrani is starting.
Right and that's what you think. But you said he is only playing Centre due to injuries which is not true. He is playing Centre as Ryles, your lover who can do no wrong, named him there over every other Centre. Dropping Kelly after round 1 and Russell to have Samrani in the team.
Ryles sees him as a Centre, he came to the club as a Centre. Is he a back-rower? Probably yes, but right now that's what your husband Ryles sees him as. Or will you admit he has it wrong or is it MON telling him to name Samrani?
"Letting him go possibly puts us in a worse position (notwithstanding the suspension he will have to serve). Our backs are junk and he's one ot the better ones. Talk about bite your nose to spite your face."
"Well that is why he is testing the market. I could see lower teams taking him to start Centre. Again, none of us are arguing ability, it is you simply saying he is only a Centre due to our injuries when that is far from the truth. He was brought to…"
Replies
Samrami isn't a centre. He's just a fill in
Samrani has played more games at centre in his senior career than every other position put together.
Only because of injuries to our starting centres. Not because he pushed a starting player out with.form
What are you talking about? He came to the club as a Centre. He played over Russell later in the year. Ryles even dropped Kelly early in the year and brought Samrani in before he himself got hurt. As soon as he was fit, he was back in.
If we get Best for 2027 for example, Samrani wont start. Simple as that. Not because we don't view him as a Centre, it is due to having a better option.
Yep. Samrani far outplayed Russell at centre in attack, though his defence wasn't as good. But also, guaranteed starters would get pai a fair bit more than fringe first graders, who get paid more than backups. If we already have Penisini on the books for 2028 and we are looking at signing Best, then the only offer we can make to Samrani is for a fringe first grader. It makes sense that he would be looking for a top 17 spot somewhere before accepting a lesser offer to stay at Parra.
If Samrani was a centre he should be absolutely cutting up these Frenchman. From what I've seen in this world cup., he couldn't cut a Devon sandwich
I don't think you are understanding what we are saying. You are saying he's not a Centre just a fill in due to injuries. He played from Harold Matt's all the way to NRL as a Centre.
Will he be better edge? Yes I agree, but saying "he only played Centre due to injuries" is false as the staff see him as a Centre as did all his coaches before that.
He has played only Centre in his entire career. As a junior at Cronulla and a Cup player at Canterbury he was a Centre.
Whether the game itself demands him to play another position or not, he is a Centre until further notice. Therefore, when comes to Round 1, incase of another signing, Samrani will be starting Centre. Now our pursuit of Best shows we want an upgrade, until then Samrani is starting.
Im saying hes a back rower. You're fired !
Right and that's what you think. But you said he is only playing Centre due to injuries which is not true. He is playing Centre as Ryles, your lover who can do no wrong, named him there over every other Centre. Dropping Kelly after round 1 and Russell to have Samrani in the team.
Ryles sees him as a Centre, he came to the club as a Centre. Is he a back-rower? Probably yes, but right now that's what your husband Ryles sees him as. Or will you admit he has it wrong or is it MON telling him to name Samrani?
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
of 7 Next