Cleary's ankle broken in preliminary final, with foul play (hip drop tackle). Stretchered off. Ref sends the Knight off because of extreme risk/damage.
Simmonson's ankle broken in Round 5, with foul play (mid air tackle). Stretchered off. Ref sends the Tiger to the sin bin for 10 mins, after telling bunker "it looks bad".
Luckily there is not a double standard where some teams are take care of and others have to fend for themselves. Sarcasm emoji's galore.
Double standard or the new standard?
Replies
I'm sure it was a coincidence that the ref then tried to disallow a fair try to Knights.
That should not have been a send off in my opinion. Cleary was already injured before starting this match and thats obvious by him not starting the game. To send the Knights player off on the basis the tackle caused a major injury is incorrect! Clearly was already injured and should not have even played becuase the risk of further injury is 100% more likely in every single tackle! The Penrith side should be responsible for breaking duty of care to their player! The chance of Knights winning now with 1 player less is highly unlikely but of closures the NRL can't have their 2 big favourite babies miss out on a Grand Final appearance. So they ensure they breast fed with the biggest sucker next week named the champions! Total farce
His prior injury has nothing to do with this injury. Him either playing or not doesn't change that tackle or the result in any form.
Rubbish! IF he didn't play guess what? NO 2nd injury! So common sense should have prevailed by the Penrith coaching staff knowing full well the Cleary was already carrying a serious injury. A 'broken right foot' and if it wasn't that serious they wouldn't have chose to him to only play limited minutes. So in my opinion the Penrith staff are fully to blame
Mallee you do realise it was not the same leg....don't you?
PS I suggest the staff at Penrith do not tell any Cleary what to do......
Of course I'm aware it was his other foot! However, playing a game of that magnitude ( or any Rugby League game) with a broken right foot would have most definitely have contributed to the severity of the hip drop injury! Even though it was his left foot!
Mallee you cannot be that thick to believe that his broken right foot had an impact on his broken left ankle?
Any player can get hurt at anytime, that's the risk within a contact sport. I would say roughly over 50% of players play most weeks with an injury of some sort that should keep them out a while.
Broken foot or not, that was happening yesterday. If he hurt his foot further where a fracture becomes worse, then yeah that's on the staff. But this injury is completely unrelated. You are basically saying if he didn't play he doesn't get injured, if that's the case he should never play as he will never get injured.
What a dumb comment with all due respect.
Maybe it's you that's 'thick' 🤣!
It was not the injured foot. His injury befire this game was his right foot. He has now broken his left foot.
All Footloose references are appropriate.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 6 Next