What would you think if definitive proof of alien life emerged? Would it consign all religious thought to, as Mark Twain once predicted, the fate of a stuffed ornament in museums? How would suggestive confirmation of the principles of uniformity and plenitude - that if life can form on Earth it can form anywhere and thus will for everywhere - mix with confirmation of the principle of mediocrity (nothing special about humans)? Would mediocrity impact humans relation with technology and would plenitude turn science skyward?
Disclosure Day (2026), Spielberg: https://youtu.be/icDuEHSxE-w?si=jKBowVzx1K6IggNh
Replies
The holy books of Judaism, Christianity and Islam describe heavenly realms teeming with angels and demons.
I notice that not too many want to get into the philosophical bent here Daz. I did watch the "road to disclosure" on You Tube in the past 24 hours and found it underwhelming, obviously I have not seen the movie yet but look forward to doing so.
If people understand the radiation type issues that allows life to exist on this planet, they would be more careful than accepting alternatives as a "fait accompli". That said I have no doubt that life exists in various forms all over the universe, but that "do doubt" is still qualifiable by and sceptic.
Fundamentally I am "agnostic" to a point, but comfortable calling myself a spiritist (Kardec) but equally comfortable in the teachings of Jesus (regardlless of his birth status)......my spiritist belief does allow for an evolvement in human spirit into pure energy and that could be a "god like existence" if that pure energy merged into one!
Back to your rationale for bringing this up (should not be in the NRL segment) I can see you are going through your own research theory and as a scientist you will only relate to fact (accepting). My view in the existence of UFO's etc is limited to everthing pointing to a smoking gun but no evidence "sighted by us" to contradict that.
I have some sympathy to a view that we have had past civilisations that have been even self destructed or naturally destructed but again its still only smoking guns.
Love these discussions!
PS "The James Webb" has seriously eroded the current concept of the "big bang" but it still boggles my mind to think, that the light from 15 billion light years away is what we are seeing and the James Webb is looking past that into older visions of the Universe.
Explain to me why science continues to call "universes" in the plural, as my limited thinking is that the Universe is single and as such represents infinity...... leaving aside theories of multi-verse ect.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next