Disclosure Day

What would you think if definitive proof of alien life emerged? Would it consign all religious thought to, as Mark Twain once predicted, the fate of a stuffed ornament in museums? How would suggestive confirmation of the principles of uniformity and plenitude - that if life can form on Earth it can form anywhere and thus will for everywhere - mix with confirmation of the principle of mediocrity (nothing special about humans)? Would mediocrity impact humans relation with technology and would plenitude turn science skyward?

Disclosure Day (2026), Spielberg: https://youtu.be/icDuEHSxE-w?si=jKBowVzx1K6IggNh

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

      • The evidence suggests there is no supernatural simply because it goes against science, and that is the way we understand everything in the world. However you are correct in the fact science cannot disprove it.

        I do not agree that the evidence is overwhelming due to the numbers that have faith. As people become more educated generally faith subsides, 500 years ago non-believers would of been very scarce indeed. 

        Religious people are athiests to all other religions other than their own. Non-religious people just go one further.

        • Strange Eel, Erich von Däniken interpreted the Nephilim in the book of genesis as referring to aliens. So I have no doubt religion would work "we never said humans were alone" into re-drawn creation myths. 

          But it would be contentious and probably split most orthodox religions. Not just creation myths, but salvation myths and ideals of human specialness. 

          I would welcome that internal division, being a secular atheist. 

          • It would be a revelation. (no pun intended)

        • Where does science come from?

          • Us

      • The absence of evidence is normally thought weak evidence to establish non-existence or non-effect, except when there has been much evidence to find the phenomena or the effect and we have reasonable grounds to expect evidence would present itself if something to see. 

        Rules out sky fairies but the vastness of space rules out any expectations that evidence would emerge easily of alien life?

    • 31135626083?profile=RESIZE_400x

    • The point here SE and I admire your oversight, but there is every chance they do exist, they just don't want to exist with us....pretty understandable really!

      10394929700?profile=RESIZE_584x

      • If you think about the vastness of the known universe, and the physical constraints of moving living beings over near infinite distances, it's highly probably that any other existing life forms may never ever come into contact with us.


        • Melek, well said.

          I too wouldn’t be too confident I had the answers.

          Given the vast gaps in our knowledge, the vastness of the universe, and its countless possibilities, it’s plausible other life forms could exist.

          Add that, along with questions about God, consciousness, and the nature of reality, dark matter, dark energy, and black holes, to the long list of things we don’t really have all the answers to.

          The moral of the story, for me: keep an open mind.

          Hold your beliefs with conviction, sure, aliens or no aliens, religious or anti-religious alike, God(s) or no God(s), but I’d also acknowledge that I could be wrong and let others be. There is already too much conflict and destruction in the world over beliefs and power struggles: Wise aliens would probably take one look at us and keep flying on, invisibly. These aliens, they might laugh. I used to be quite anti-religious, but I can't be that way anymore. 

          Certainty is easy. Humility is harder, but far easier to live with.

           
          P.S. I haven't seen the film yet, but probably will.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poupou Escobar replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Disclosure Day
"Who gets to decide what is and isn't an extraordinary claim? I'm sure Sagan and the people who quote him have a convenient answer to that one."
2 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Disclosure Day
"Daz, I like what Carl Sagan said: "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". The Sagan Standard seems almost identical to Hume's reasoning."
7 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Disclosure Day
"LB, the film and TV industry itself created this kind of closed cycle story telling. A reluctance to end without tying everything off neatly. A reluctance to end with a question. So I don't mind Disclosure Day bucking that trend. 
If anyone wants to…"
8 minutes ago
Strange-eel replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Disclosure Day
"I get that theory too, that they would be so superior to us that they would not even be that interested. But I lean towards the real constraints of time and distances."
14 minutes ago
More…