Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
  • Where did Clunes name come from.

    He's a decent backup.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • True but to purchase another half for backup for 3/4 games would be a waste. Unless BA has come to realise JA isn't ready. I'd prefer a big body to be signed. Manly knocked back Parra's approach for Taupau twice yesterday afternoon.

      • There is absolutely no way BA isn't using this chance for Jake . He tried shifting one of the best 5/8 in the comp to get him in the side and when that didn't work he thought Mahoney and him could be the next Brad Drew & PJ Marsh . 

        He's 100% sticking him in now this chance has opened up . Even if a capabale backup became available  tomorrow .. Jake is his man . 

        • Haha can't argue with that tbh 

    • How does it have to be Clune?

      There could be other options..

  • Hock

    • FINALLY!!!

  • I don't think Manly will let us have him. If it was a club other than us they probably would let him go.

    Clune would be a handy pick up and a much better option at 7 than JA.

    • Manly also have some pretty big internal issues to sort out and the last thing they need is a senior player kicking stones.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"Phone calls are harder as you can't prove what was said unless it was tapped. Emails and the rest yeah. Parra had this in their back pocket for a while and were waiting for the final nail to drop and them threatening us with cap penalties was the…"
30 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"I am not saying we shouldn't try, just if we lose and it is a possibility even if slight, that's more likely what happens. If that does happen then it is us against the NRL mentality to fuel us."
32 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"The Seventy Maxims of Maximally Effective Mercenaries clearly states ....#29. The enemy of my enemy is my enemy's enemy. No more. No less."
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"As evident in our forums, getting folks to pull their heads in is not as easy as it seems. What if we said Fuck it. WWE needs it's villains
The Parramatta Squeaky-whEels.....We have whinged in these pages forever that we always get shafted. What…"
1 hour ago
More…