Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
  • Where did Clunes name come from.

    He's a decent backup.

  • it has to be Clune if that rumour is true, even if BA stubbornly uses his son we still need another back up to cover another injury to the halves.

    • True but to purchase another half for backup for 3/4 games would be a waste. Unless BA has come to realise JA isn't ready. I'd prefer a big body to be signed. Manly knocked back Parra's approach for Taupau twice yesterday afternoon.

      • There is absolutely no way BA isn't using this chance for Jake . He tried shifting one of the best 5/8 in the comp to get him in the side and when that didn't work he thought Mahoney and him could be the next Brad Drew & PJ Marsh . 

        He's 100% sticking him in now this chance has opened up . Even if a capabale backup became available  tomorrow .. Jake is his man . 

        • Haha can't argue with that tbh 

    • How does it have to be Clune?

      There could be other options..

  • Hock

    • FINALLY!!!

  • I don't think Manly will let us have him. If it was a club other than us they probably would let him go.

    Clune would be a handy pick up and a much better option at 7 than JA.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

parra supporter replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"1) don't hate or love it. As long as there's no delay waiting for coaches orders for kick or receive I'm not overly against it.
2) not the biggest fan. It'll see players play 18-19th man over several weeks and get no game time for nrl or cup. …"
5 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"If we kick deep and they get to the 40, that would be on us.   They shouldn't be getting near half way"
7 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"I know mate its all about entertainment and gambling."
8 hours ago
Joeyboyz replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"That's exactly the type of scenario that they want.
 "
8 hours ago
More…