DE GOIS is RUBBISH!

Bet the sharks were doing hi fives when they saw the back of this wanna be hooker! Again a great signing by our club! Too slow and adds nothing to our offence!!!!!Why do we love throwing our cash away!Sack de gois!

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I call dup. A lime jelly and a raspberry jelly is still jelly.

  • We signed him because we needed an available hooker, it was a desperate signing and it could have been a lot worse. If we sacked him what would we do for the rest of the season? Kelly goes okay but he still is out of position, Pritchard is shithouse and worse then Kelly. We don't have great depth With that role, degois is the best we have.
    • Very well put mate. I agree. At the time there wasn't a lot of options available & we were desperate following Peats injury. We just grabbed the best on offer at the time.

  • His the least of our problems at the moment.
  • We probably don't have another option but it remains true that DeGois was bad against the Warriors. Johnson's try from a grubber was all DeGois shooting out of the line and then missing the tackle anyway. Otherwise he just fairy grabbed those Warriors forwards, contributing to zero holding power in the middle.
    • Lets blame IDG for the loss Prof as obviously the other 16 players must have gone ok!

  • What were you expecting to sign Cameron smith mid season or something?
    De gois is a solid player that attempts everything to the best of his ability week in week out and will look much better behind a forward pack that's not getting dominated.
    It's a shame most of his team mates don't turn up to every game with the competitiveness as Isaacs.
    • X2
  • That's harsh fongy, I don't think anyone would of stopped a rampaging Sam Tomkins close to the line. Norman bravely stood his ground but Tomkins is a wrecking machine.

    • lol Joseph, yep Pomkins has been a total wrecking ball all season and poor Corey was just another one of his victims.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Michael W. replied to Pato's discussion Xerri
"You want to trade two backs for an average forward, what are you on about."
13 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Winning It Twice, Off The Canvas
"A great view on how we did it, HOE. 
I'm wondering if we are forgetting the 27th person on the field, the referee. I'm watching a different game this year, where it feels referees are playing a huge part in the games. I can't get over the feeling…"
38 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Pato's discussion Xerri
"All good mate, it must be something both clubs are open to. I have no idea why the dogs wanted Galvin (but they did). He would have been a much better fit with us. Sometimes there's things in life we simply don't understand or can't explain."
1 hour ago
LB replied to Pato's discussion Xerri
"I would not be against Blore. But just temper expectations on him as he was this superstar in the making, did nothing at Wests, took some time at Melbourne and though was very good he was just that very good.
Take him out will he be the same? Not…"
1 hour ago
More…