David Fifita

Curious as to others thoughts.. with David Fafita free to negotiate with other clubs from November 1st, what bearing may yesterdays result have on his intent to stay with the Broncos?

Parramatta are building something special for years to come, the money on offer is very very competitive.....

 

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I saw Fifita at the end of the games shaking hands and ended with Ma’u and had a longer word and admiring look and respect. Hopefully after that games he sees us and wants to be apart of it. Broncos need to buy playmakers and won’t have the money idc who they get rid of I think they’ll still be too tight. Milford might leave, Macca might, Bird might, Boyd might, but getting rid of them will cost money. I only see us having the money to buy him and he’s too perfect of an option to replace ma’u. I think we could get him for 850-900k if we offer 5 years. 

    • I’m sorry pork and beans I don’t like it. 900 k for 5 years, he’s a good foward but not worth that lol

      • It’s either him or Matterson for 500+. Lane and him are probably too similar. 

        • i also say Matterson , he is the best replacement for Mau

          I think most clubs (other than the roosters) struggle with their cap with Million $ players

          Hardworking, skillful players at half the price are what we need

  • $500,000 Max  for 3 years

    We dont play every Friday night , have a few daytime  games each year plus Darwin.

    Broncos forwards cant handle sun or temperatures over 16 degrees.

    Yesterday proved that

    • This reply was deleted.
      • Couldn’t agree more good Dr.

      • They’ll let Oates go and play Arthurs on that wing from the Titans I think. 

  • He's not worth $1M at the moment but by the end of five years he'll probably be worth more than that.

    • That does not mean there will be a Club out there prepared to offer this money!

      • There's always desperate clubs out there pinching stars off the big clubs by paying massive overs.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Prof. Daz replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"Why throw in Matterson? Especially if the reason is to sweeten the deal for the Storm. Frak those cheats, they do what we say or STFU and Lomax can sit on his butt waiting for R360 like was his plan. "
10 seconds ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"Yes you are right Adam.  There's no use spending cap money on a risk like Warbrick and blore isn't going to change anything or improve the Eels. 
I think you are correct the Eels need to dig in . However,  I think its extremely long odds that we get…"
33 seconds ago
Prof. Daz replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"Not giving the team who made the GF the last two years in a row a freebie rep outside back is NOT worthless. The Eels are in the box seat. They are under no obligation to hand an advantage to the Storm. The Eels have already been disadvantaged by…"
5 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"Very smart comment Adam.
We should also remember that Storm approached us about the possibility, nobody actually knows if Lomax is interested in going to Melb. 
The other thing is that any club is allowed to make the same approach, if Newcastle were…"
11 minutes ago
More…