David Fifita

Curious as to others thoughts.. with David Fafita free to negotiate with other clubs from November 1st, what bearing may yesterdays result have on his intent to stay with the Broncos?

Parramatta are building something special for years to come, the money on offer is very very competitive.....

 

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I saw Fifita at the end of the games shaking hands and ended with Ma’u and had a longer word and admiring look and respect. Hopefully after that games he sees us and wants to be apart of it. Broncos need to buy playmakers and won’t have the money idc who they get rid of I think they’ll still be too tight. Milford might leave, Macca might, Bird might, Boyd might, but getting rid of them will cost money. I only see us having the money to buy him and he’s too perfect of an option to replace ma’u. I think we could get him for 850-900k if we offer 5 years. 

    • I’m sorry pork and beans I don’t like it. 900 k for 5 years, he’s a good foward but not worth that lol

      • It’s either him or Matterson for 500+. Lane and him are probably too similar. 

        • i also say Matterson , he is the best replacement for Mau

          I think most clubs (other than the roosters) struggle with their cap with Million $ players

          Hardworking, skillful players at half the price are what we need

  • $500,000 Max  for 3 years

    We dont play every Friday night , have a few daytime  games each year plus Darwin.

    Broncos forwards cant handle sun or temperatures over 16 degrees.

    Yesterday proved that

    • This reply was deleted.
      • Couldn’t agree more good Dr.

      • They’ll let Oates go and play Arthurs on that wing from the Titans I think. 

  • He's not worth $1M at the moment but by the end of five years he'll probably be worth more than that.

    • That does not mean there will be a Club out there prepared to offer this money!

      • There's always desperate clubs out there pinching stars off the big clubs by paying massive overs.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

will replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"Ryles is wanting speed.
He wants fast mobile forwards and speedy backs
Howarth does tick a box for the 6 man interchange. 
A 2nd rower who can play centre could be valuable "
19 minutes ago
Longfin Eel replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"I have a feeling Melbourne will go cold on this now that we have called their bluff. Not sure where that leaves the situation. It's unfathomable what Schifcofske has done here. What's more baffling is that the media seems to have left him alone. "
20 minutes ago
Eel for life replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels Dig In on Player Release, Demand Fair Value in Any Deal
"Totally support the club and the way they've handled things in this scenario. We have to give them credit where credit is due. We're quick to critisise when they get something wrong, so we should be quick to give them credit when they do something…"
28 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"One of the issues with Howarth for Lomax is that if we set aside that it's not an appropriate value exchange (all remarks about rep status etc) we are still left with an unknown. Specifically, what does Ryles want in an outside back?
We don't have…"
36 minutes ago
More…