Replies

  • I found it telling his response about Hodgson, didn't seem to keen on 2024, mentioning it was in his favour the option.

    • Yep he didn't offer much praise to JH at all. Just wanted to change the subject to now

      • Only praise was saying good on him for taking up the option. Just how he said "Not sure on next year" usually BA would give the professional type answer like he's good for us and will offer Hands more help etc. But it seemed like it was simply BA was annoyed by it but respected it as he did have an option in his favour.    

  • No Lane. Blake will be 18th man.

    • Which is not a dreadful thing, as long as Blake is only used as a back-up. I would rather Blake on the wing over Dunster at this point due to his speed and ability to score more so. 

  • He just had a operation on his neck, will be medically retired, watch and see.

    • 110% agree. Was thinking the same. 

    • Looks like he toughed it out to get game 150, now retiring, but getting the pay on the outer.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Michael W. replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Get out clauses attached to BA
"Can't believe how many dumb fools are here, NO player has a get out clause if BA is sacked or leaves, I can guarantee that 100%."
1 hour ago
Michael W. replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Get out clauses attached to BA
"I can see it now, Bennett signs 24 players to replace the ones who had clauses in their contracts, headed by the Bromych bros, Kaufusi and an elite halves combo in Nikorima and Milford."
1 hour ago
Michael W. replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Get out clauses attached to BA
"Typical flog, your name says it all..Anal is."
1 hour ago
Michael W. replied to Adrian Bowles's discussion Zac Lomax
"He was actually told BA would be extended at the end of the season, for '26 and '27."
1 hour ago
More…