Club Statement | Josh Addo-Carr

The Parramatta Eels would like to provide an update regarding Josh Addo-Carr following a driving incident in September.

After reviewing all relevant information, including the negative result of the B sample, the Club has cleared Josh in relation to the issues raised following the incident. The NRL has also confirmed it will not be taking any further action, and the Club now considers the matter closed.

Separately, the Club has informed Josh and his management that it will not be seeking to extend his current contract beyond the end of the 2027 season.

Following these discussions, Josh and the Club have mutually agreed that it is in his best interests to immediately explore opportunities elsewhere to give Josh the best opportunity to secure his future.

The Club will continue to support Josh as he considers his next opportunity.

 

https://www.parraeels.com.au/news/2026/11/12/club-statement--josh-addo-carr/

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

★
★
★
★
★
Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Wow.  So Josh may have played his last game here and if he finds an opportunity elsewhere, there's no doubt he will be immediately released. 

    There's no doubt Josh would have been immediately sacked if the b sample was positive,  and now it seems there's a lot more to this story behind the scenes. 

    There's absolutely no doubt there's more to this. 

    There has to be another player who is coming and plans may have been around Josh's b sample. 

    • Wise Kativerata has returned

  • This is a bad decision by the club. 

  • If it's negative you have to go by that last sample. He can't be judged on that, I think it's a bad decision, losing Lomax was a mistake, this one just as big. 

    • Nobody knows what was said behind closed doors.  Maybe there were admissions.  Why else would Parramatta take this stance.  

      Also, the rehabilitation admission seemed a little strange.  

      • Well it could be anything but i think regardless of him going through an investigation or not, JAC was slim chance of being at Parramatta come 2028. Age wise it makes sense to move on. I think Ryles and Parra were fine with him staying in 2027, but once he said, which he is entitled to, he wanted to look elsewhere for a long term deal, it seems its either you want to be here or not. Granted it seems hypocritical in other areas.

        We could have someone lined up other than Schiller.

        • I would back JAC to be the fastest in our club over the next 3 years, regardless of his age.....

  • Incredible: in 2 years, lost NSW wingers (Lomax and Fox) to rely on Alameddine, Jake Tago or Arthur Miller-Stephen.

    GOD HELP US

    • Tago and Miller-Stephen aren't even at the club anymore.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Club Statement | Josh Addo-Carr
"George Jennings "
2 minutes ago
Rabz S replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Josh Addo-Carr free to join rival club effective immediately after Eels re-signing blow
""
5 minutes ago
Make Parra Great Again replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Club Statement | Josh Addo-Carr
"Maybe a move to Colombia to play league might suit him 🤣"
5 minutes ago
Parrafan101 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Club Statement | Josh Addo-Carr
"Ryles in my opinion making moves that doesn't make sense Lomax and now Fox because of the "culture" lost faith in this farce of a coach. We aren't evolving we are taking steps back and forwards, but everytime we move forward we take 10 steps back."
5 minutes ago
More…