Replies

  • No, if he's not playing in the NRL his contract is void, but he can return to the NRL and start playing for us under his previous contract.

    So, if he does turn around and say, well if Storm and Eels can't agree, I might as well come back to the Eels and get paid, we'll need to have money in our cap and fulfil his contract, or release him. It's like a big game of chicken.

  • No, he doesn't have a playing contract with us. We are not paying him a cent as it is right now.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Bubba j replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"Good to see the club going hard on this if the storm don't want to play ball stuff them someone else will be up for a swap"
6 minutes ago
Mannah-Brow replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"I would go for Stefano, the perfect replacement for Paulo, an ex-eels junior, whose family is probably still located in Sydney (a big incentive to come back to Sydney I would imagine) and, we throw in Matterson. That way they get Lomax to strengthen…"
7 minutes ago
RB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"If the eels do nothing then another team will offer something later down the track. Lomax has another 3yrs with parramatta. What's the rush if they offer f all?"
21 minutes ago
Hugh replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"why would Stefano want to come back to Parra?"
36 minutes ago
More…