Replies

  • No, if he's not playing in the NRL his contract is void, but he can return to the NRL and start playing for us under his previous contract.

    So, if he does turn around and say, well if Storm and Eels can't agree, I might as well come back to the Eels and get paid, we'll need to have money in our cap and fulfil his contract, or release him. It's like a big game of chicken.

  • No, he doesn't have a playing contract with us. We are not paying him a cent as it is right now.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"MB do you think that Bellamey has figured out that Stefano maybe a "pea heart" and would be happy to see him slide by. "
3 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"Keon was next year!"
5 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"Your right Coryn but Matto's salary could be a hell of a front end paid to an existing player/s (tax adjusted) to recruit someone like the dogs 5/8 for next year. i.e say 4 certain players Parra will have next year get a 150 each up front, adjusted…"
7 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"Best outcome: Eels get Utoikamanu (will take over from Paulo eventually) and either Coates or Howarth. Lomax injures himself then bails on his Storm contract for underwater wrestling. "
7 minutes ago
More…