Cameron Smith the untouchable!

So, even after, he is recorded very clearly challenging the integrity of the referree, he escapes with no penalty, meanwhile others who have done the same, get binned or sent.  No consequence from the NRL Review Committee.  Says it all.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

                  • No one wins "honestly", every team that ever wins takes whatever liberties they can get away with.

                    Cam Smith is no different 

                    • Liberties dont bend or break rules to win. Its called cheating.

                    • It's called winning

                    • I'll agree to disagree on that.

    • If he was playing for us this year in the finals we would have beat the Storm, and Souths. And I reckon we would have got Penrith as well.

      So, yeah, I agree Bretto. If he wore blue & gold he would be the most loved player at our club by a very long way.

      • It would be a case of "Peter who ???", "Ray who ???", "Jarryd who ???"

        Can you imagine him working off the back of Junior Paulo's ball playing, or Nathan Brown kicking off the back fence, or finding Gutho, Mitch or Dylan in the just the right spot to break the defence down ?

        We'd be unbeatable, and I say that as a huge Reed Mahoney fan.

        Game management certainly wouldn't be a problem.

        • Loll! What a joke Brett! You must wear a Storm jersey underneath ( maybe over the top) of the Eels jersey. To praise Cameron Grubby Smith over Ray Price and Peter Sterling is disgraceful as an Eels supporter.

        • Two words say it all Bretto :  Game Management.

          I'd even love to have him as a spine coach for a while. He's like Sterlo was, he's on another level.

      • Definitely. He's a winner, it's what he does.

        • Cheating - no argument from me on that score ME.

          He, along with many others at the Storm should have been rubbed out of the game in 2010, as it was the only person to be penalised was Brian Waldron - who immediately went on to a top position with Rugby Union, so he wasn't really penalised at all.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"Phone calls are harder as you can't prove what was said unless it was tapped. Emails and the rest yeah. Parra had this in their back pocket for a while and were waiting for the final nail to drop and them threatening us with cap penalties was the…"
2 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"I am not saying we shouldn't try, just if we lose and it is a possibility even if slight, that's more likely what happens. If that does happen then it is us against the NRL mentality to fuel us."
4 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"The Seventy Maxims of Maximally Effective Mercenaries clearly states ....#29. The enemy of my enemy is my enemy's enemy. No more. No less."
52 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"As evident in our forums, getting folks to pull their heads in is not as easy as it seems. What if we said Fuck it. WWE needs it's villains
The Parramatta Squeaky-whEels.....We have whinged in these pages forever that we always get shafted. What…"
1 hour ago
More…