So, even after, he is recorded very clearly challenging the integrity of the referree, he escapes with no penalty, meanwhile others who have done the same, get binned or sent. No consequence from the NRL Review Committee. Says it all.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
Replies
Thats ridiculous Brett. Then scrap all the other areas that Rugby League is endeavouring to promote the misuse and abuse of like racism, abuse against women, sexual discrimination etc...you cant attempt to promote moral standards without the players and staff attempting to live by those standards on and off the field.
Those other things are worthwhile causes to promote, but they're irrelevent to the game itself. If the game didn't promote those causes the game would still be the same. In the end it is just a game of football and nothing of significance hangs of its outcome.
If someone cheats, what have they really done ?
Really ?
They've cheated at a game.
Who gives a flying fuck.
It should be a concern Brett. What if for example your playing in a card game with your home, car, and everything you have at stake and you lose it all only to find out later the game was rigged and the winner cheated. Would you be ok with that? As its only a game as you say.
That's your fault for gambling on a game of footy. Don't be so fucking stupid.
I dont gamble period ( not since I was a wee laddy) and that was only on horses. Ive not done that for 35 plus years. Gambling is a mugs game. I used that as an example for you Brett not to say I gambled. It was obviously misunderstood by you.
I think sports fans care far more about systematic cheating of a game than someones personal drug habits.
Heaps of players are giving the ref's a heap. He actually does it in a more respectful way by not swearing at them or calling them names like others.
Cameron Smith is the best in the game, time to get over it and move on EE.
Agreed
He uses thinly veiled sarcasm instead.
Disagreed
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
of 26 Next