Bunker Interference and Advantage Rules

Its been a strange season with a lot of changes but tonight i saw something I've never seen before and it went completley unoticed as far as I can tell.

When Benji got injured play stopped about three plays after he went down. Tigers were tackled on the last and it was gonna be a change over.

Then the Bunker has a look and says there should be a penalty. That's some serious advantage given to the Tigers.

I thought it was fair enough that Smith get placed on report but to give a penalty??? The ref missed it. Simple as that, play had gone on.

Have the rules changed?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Yeah I definitely noticed. What an absolute joke! 

  • You know this happens in every game now? 

     

    I don't like the bunker getting involved full stop, must be run by the village idiots. 

    • Someone goes down injured with no penalty given. Play is stopped and the bunker gets in the ear of the ref and tells him to give a penalty. This happens every week.

      But once play has gone on and play is stopped 3 takles later. This doesn't happen every week.

  • Hate to say it but I totally agree with Gus. The bunker is a joke and it has to go. But it won't of course. On referees there were 6-0. 6 again before Parra got 1. That would be a disaster in the finals and was in no way indicative of reality.

    • Agreed and this is when Brad needs to step in and point this shit out.

      Weve lost so many lopsided 6 again counts recently and it goes totally unmentioned by Brad in the pressers. Brad needs to push back through the media and at least get them talking about it. If this happened I assure you we would get a fairer go next outing. Brad needs to cop the $10k......But as it didn't again, we will cop another sausage next week vs the Storm - watch.

       

  • I was questioning that. How many plays can they go back. Surely it can't be more than one. Imagine eels had scored to win in a semi and they went back three plays and gave the other team a penalty. Would be worse than the raiders 6 again debacle. 

    • I'm pretty sure they can't go back at all. Once play has moved on, even one tackle, that's it.

  • Bunker has too much control of decisions. Its slowed the game down. 

  • Bunker may of interfered but did they get the right decision? 

  • Bunker was pretty quick to award Leilua's try. Did you see how surprised he was ? I swear I saw his lips say fark me.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

The Badger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion 1st teams list v sharks
"6 man it may be but you can still only use 4 of them. 2 guys will be regularly getting splinters."
17 minutes ago
The Badger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"They met and didn't agree an outcome. Court is still the option."
22 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"particularly given PLV is discretionary and selective...that is a super polite way to describe corruption.
were introduced “to preserve the integrity of NRL...difficult to acheive when the man at the top is discretionary and selective.
a club who…"
47 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"PG,
He’s already shown he’s not willing to be rushed into a decision by the Lomax camp to suit them.
From all accounts, he’s a straight shooter and an excellent judge. I believe he’s a former equity barrister as well, so he’s experienced and…"
1 hour ago
More…