Curious.
Would it add to the modern real world game ie: 13 game. Attacking game , exiting for lesser teams jagging extra points to beat more fancied sides .Could it make the game better ?
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"If a referee has a gambling problem that big, corruption has to be a massive concern. Shame on the NRL for sweeping it under the carpet. I hope he's been investigated and come out squeeky clean with his account being monitored "
"400k fmd. Referees 100 percent are gambling on games just like the players. "
"Doesn't surprise me , he's the most arrogant ref in the game who has made some of the most disgraceful decisions that have cost teams games ."
" Say no more "
Replies
No
No
It's a bit of a gimmick that is best left in the 9's format I think.
Maybe there is a try scoring zone which includes the area between the posts and 10M on either side of the posts that is automatically a 6 point try with no conversion attempt. Would speed up the game and kickers rarely miss ftom this range anyway.
That might work
Rarely but they do kicking is a skill that decides a game. The close kicks 1 would argue are more important to the outcome cause a missed close kicks haunts a kicker/team more then the sideline miss
Yeah I know. But to fix alot of things within the game. It would produce a complete rethinking of attacking. It also throws a psychological element into it. I'm behind by one etc. But yeah you need to play everyone twice.
Only for Parra. Everyone else has to score at least from 10 meters out.
I didn't mind the 20:40 kick. That was unexpected.
I didn't go but apparently the goal posts lit up when a conversion happened and a try was scored? Brilliant.
Is the 20-40 rule going to enter the full edition of the game? That would be great. It would certainly help balance field position. Any team with a decent kicker would be licking their lips.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next