Posted by Chuck Norris. on October 19, 2019 at 11:06pm
Curious.
Would it add to the modern real world game ie: 13 game. Attacking game , exiting for lesser teams jagging extra points to beat more fancied sides .Could it make the game better ?
Views: 299
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
Maybe there is a try scoring zone which includes the area between the posts and 10M on either side of the posts that is automatically a 6 point try with no conversion attempt. Would speed up the game and kickers rarely miss ftom this range anyway.
Brett Allen > Mark CammanOctober 20, 2019 at 12:07pm
Rarely but they do kicking is a skill that decides a game. The close kicks 1 would argue are more important to the outcome cause a missed close kicks haunts a kicker/team more then the sideline miss
The problem with this is the draw isn't even, you play some teams twice and others once, it would be an unfair advantage to the teams that get to play the bad teams twice while others will only get to pay them once.
Yeah I know. But to fix alot of things within the game. It would produce a complete rethinking of attacking. It also throws a psychological element into it. I'm behind by one etc. But yeah you need to play everyone twice.
I didn't mind the 20:40 kick. That was unexpected. I didn't go but apparently the goal posts lit up when a conversion happened and a try was scored? Brilliant.
" I absolutely love this move by the club, I said in another blog we needed to show some teeth and let the sleeping giant of the NRL let all and sundry know we are no pushover."
"This is a reputation reset for the Parramatta Football Club, everyone within the rugby league world has now taken notice an will be thinking twice about trying to screw us. This is a bold move to publicly state they are suing someone and I will be…"
"This is the strong stance we've all been hoping for from the club. Parra by putting this out in public like they have calling out the Storm like they have is gingtonbe huge. The NRL has no leg to stand on, RPLA is nowhere to be found and for once…"
"Fine by us. Yeah we get nothing out of it on the field, but morale wise we set a reputation. By the time this is all sorted R360 could be up and going again anyway."
Replies
No
No
It's a bit of a gimmick that is best left in the 9's format I think.
Maybe there is a try scoring zone which includes the area between the posts and 10M on either side of the posts that is automatically a 6 point try with no conversion attempt. Would speed up the game and kickers rarely miss ftom this range anyway.
That might work
Rarely but they do kicking is a skill that decides a game. The close kicks 1 would argue are more important to the outcome cause a missed close kicks haunts a kicker/team more then the sideline miss
The problem with this is the draw isn't even, you play some teams twice and others once, it would be an unfair advantage to the teams that get to play the bad teams twice while others will only get to pay them once.
Yeah I know. But to fix alot of things within the game. It would produce a complete rethinking of attacking. It also throws a psychological element into it. I'm behind by one etc. But yeah you need to play everyone twice.
Only for Parra. Everyone else has to score at least from 10 meters out.
I didn't mind the 20:40 kick. That was unexpected.
I didn't go but apparently the goal posts lit up when a conversion happened and a try was scored? Brilliant.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next