Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • That F'ing forward pass for starters fongny!!! unbelievable.

    • Come on Frankie! It's a disgrace especially after last week's refereeing debacle.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • Ha ha no Frankie the refereeing is a disgrace just like in the Roosters vs Eels last week.

  • Well now there's something to whinge about

     

  • Definitely going to whinge about that forward pass how the fuck did they miss that but not Mahoney's?

  • Forward pass Frankie you wanker! Parra should of scored a try early in the game should of been 12nil fuck wit you cheating dog!

    • You are most uncouth. Control those disgraceful urges son. 

      • This reply was deleted.
        • I'll belt the living shit out of you Frankie bring it on wanker you cheating dog!

  • We keep giving up the ball and loosing the ruck.

    We are the last team to whinge about a forward pass after the manly game

    • Offside, there was a massive difference between Canberra's forward pass try and the one in the Manly game. Last night the ball was about a metre forward and I think the receiver was in front of the passer when the ball left his hands. That used to be an offside pass and the offending team would concede a penalty rather than a scrum being set after a forward pass to an onside player.

       

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hector replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Pod cast paul kent had Steve Gilles on on is management company as Lomax manager Dear Clinton he states it was the storm that contacted them regarding interest in Lomax not the other way round way around  (the he said they said)  is now out there…"
40 minutes ago
Tin Tim replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Parra can't & wont lose this, any outcome will be in the Eels favour. Second the Storm ain't the only team that going to ask about Lomax, you'll find whoever can come up with a good deal will win Lomax signature. "
40 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"A simple player swap for the sake of it is not good enough. Using Howarth as an example, does he make Parra better? Maybe a little, but he's no Lomax and Lomax will make Melbourne a lot better. Unless it's Munster, Stefano or Coates, no deal…"
41 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"The only scenario where Lomax has some standing and this is a complete hypothetical is if Parra are not acting in good faith. Say if Lomax already approached Parra and said he wanted to come back and Parra said " no, we don't want you anymore " OR…"
53 minutes ago
More…