Are our Eels relentless enough to win it. l.

  1.  In my years of watching footy the relentless teams with defensive intensity ,the continual roll of a wave in attack for the full 80 minutes are generally the overall winners of competitions. Week in week out it has to be produced. The grunt work  is necessary  to unleash the stars.  In your face defence for 80, zip and run from dummy half. Everybody backing up a half break. Our great Eels sides had it,  the Storm and Roosters have shown it the last 20 years . We have the players ,we have the coaching staff , do we have the desire to get it done.   

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

        • Seth I agree based on semi against Penrith but we have lost some key players 

          I hope you are right I really do- but I have never felt confident with BA leading us to the prize - if we had kept the roster we had and added these new coaching staff I might feel more confident 

           

          • The roster isn't really changing until 2023 

            • No Will Smith, Carlo will have no one to flick her bean.

              • Losing Will Smith would've really made the bookies reevaluate our premiership odds this year.  I think we shortened by $3 . The Titans blew out to $25

          • only lost will.....in all fairness we dont lose much, if anything, with him going.

    • Snake, I think in the semi against Penrith we showed our coaches and team were good enough to win. We got dead set dudded . Old Maya saying, in 22 ,big Eel become King.

       

  • Almost always, the team that is the best team all year wins the comp. Not necessarily the minor premier but usually close to it. We need to be the best team in the comp, that's the goal. Not try and jag a comp by going on a late season run. Be the best, all year!

    • Beautifull rhetoric Mutt's.....why can't we be the best?

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Adam Magrath replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"I've never agreed with the term "swap" being used in this saga. There is no swap. Lomax isn't an employee of ours. Not sure why the nrl want to involve themselves in this, or the players association for that matter. It's an agreement between us and…"
12 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"Best example I can think of is if a player tears an acl then the club rips up his 4 year contract 🤣 unfortunate situations happen but you've signed the damn contract "
17 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"It's just not the right way to do things is it. I have no idea what the final outcome of this will be, as I said before likely that Lomax pays some sort of compensation and it's done - not ideal from our perspective but that's life."
17 minutes ago
The Badger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Does anyone remember this?
"Only difference here is that JAC was actually playing so NRL had no interest in getting him back into the game. 
Not sure why they're so interested in this 1 guy who is most likely going to go to R360 if/when  it actually starts."
20 minutes ago
More…