Replies

  • If you mad before wait until you hear this useless person of a referees boss explain the controversial moments. I can guarantee you'll be livid!!

    • He fucking said the Will Smith one was a legitimate penalty. What the fuck was he watching? Where's the penalty for Papa being smacked in the face? FMD.

      • To be fair they base all of Penriths high tackles on Nathan Cleary's facial proportions which mean the chin protrudes at least 20 inches below the bottom lip.

        Therefore anything above the hips is a high tackle.

        • This reply was deleted.
        • 🤣 - I don't know how he hasn't broken it..

        • Don't forget the forid Captain... you could take a swing from the stands and connect with that forid!

      • That's bullshit.....even Stevie Wonder could tell that was a legit tackle.

        So we get done by a two point bullshit penalty and the guy sees no issue with it - that'll do me.

    • As you said mate, if we were the Roosters he wouldn't be able to apologise quickly and profusely enough. He'd be offering his first born as restitution.

      F****** scumbag.

  • Why do the NRL react after the game is over. This shit has been happening all season and in this multi million dollar game they just keep getting it wrong. The bunker goes back to whatever suits them & I have no doubt their alias sports betting account looks a lot better due to it. Lets face it, The fans see it, The commentaors see it, The players on the field bring it up but it still they make the wrong decisions. Even though they can check it they don't. Also interesting how they pick and choose what they replay.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Brissy can you confirm this....when Stone passed that ball, and Klein pulled it up I'm sure Gutho wanted to challenge it but Klein said he can't challenge a forward pass. But Klein signalled a knock on, I'm confused.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Bob Smith replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"This contravenes code of conduct number 5."
4 hours ago
Bob Smith replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"This contravenes Guideline 4: sexist. "
4 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"No doubts about it. Hopefully this will make clubs second this before trying this with us again thinking we'll just rollover."
7 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to EA's discussion Eels Announce Junior Teams
"21-23 is the age I want to see if the club can retain the key to this crop of kids.
Thats for the most part where the bell toll's mentally and physically for these kids.
We just have to keep stacking the talent and identifying the next group…"
8 hours ago
More…