Replies

  • If you mad before wait until you hear this useless person of a referees boss explain the controversial moments. I can guarantee you'll be livid!!

    • He fucking said the Will Smith one was a legitimate penalty. What the fuck was he watching? Where's the penalty for Papa being smacked in the face? FMD.

      • To be fair they base all of Penriths high tackles on Nathan Cleary's facial proportions which mean the chin protrudes at least 20 inches below the bottom lip.

        Therefore anything above the hips is a high tackle.

        • This reply was deleted.
        • 🤣 - I don't know how he hasn't broken it..

        • Don't forget the forid Captain... you could take a swing from the stands and connect with that forid!

      • That's bullshit.....even Stevie Wonder could tell that was a legit tackle.

        So we get done by a two point bullshit penalty and the guy sees no issue with it - that'll do me.

    • As you said mate, if we were the Roosters he wouldn't be able to apologise quickly and profusely enough. He'd be offering his first born as restitution.

      F****** scumbag.

  • Why do the NRL react after the game is over. This shit has been happening all season and in this multi million dollar game they just keep getting it wrong. The bunker goes back to whatever suits them & I have no doubt their alias sports betting account looks a lot better due to it. Lets face it, The fans see it, The commentaors see it, The players on the field bring it up but it still they make the wrong decisions. Even though they can check it they don't. Also interesting how they pick and choose what they replay.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Brissy can you confirm this....when Stone passed that ball, and Klein pulled it up I'm sure Gutho wanted to challenge it but Klein said he can't challenge a forward pass. But Klein signalled a knock on, I'm confused.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

will replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"Ryles is wanting speed.
He wants fast mobile forwards and speedy backs
Howarth does tick a box for the 6 man interchange. 
A 2nd rower who can play centre could be valuable "
7 minutes ago
Longfin Eel replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"I have a feeling Melbourne will go cold on this now that we have called their bluff. Not sure where that leaves the situation. It's unfathomable what Schifcofske has done here. What's more baffling is that the media seems to have left him alone. "
8 minutes ago
Eel for life replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels Dig In on Player Release, Demand Fair Value in Any Deal
"Totally support the club and the way they've handled things in this scenario. We have to give them credit where credit is due. We're quick to critisise when they get something wrong, so we should be quick to give them credit when they do something…"
16 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"One of the issues with Howarth for Lomax is that if we set aside that it's not an appropriate value exchange (all remarks about rep status etc) we are still left with an unknown. Specifically, what does Ryles want in an outside back?
We don't have…"
24 minutes ago
More…