Replies

  • If you mad before wait until you hear this useless person of a referees boss explain the controversial moments. I can guarantee you'll be livid!!

    • He fucking said the Will Smith one was a legitimate penalty. What the fuck was he watching? Where's the penalty for Papa being smacked in the face? FMD.

      • To be fair they base all of Penriths high tackles on Nathan Cleary's facial proportions which mean the chin protrudes at least 20 inches below the bottom lip.

        Therefore anything above the hips is a high tackle.

        • This reply was deleted.
        • 🤣 - I don't know how he hasn't broken it..

        • Don't forget the forid Captain... you could take a swing from the stands and connect with that forid!

      • That's bullshit.....even Stevie Wonder could tell that was a legit tackle.

        So we get done by a two point bullshit penalty and the guy sees no issue with it - that'll do me.

    • As you said mate, if we were the Roosters he wouldn't be able to apologise quickly and profusely enough. He'd be offering his first born as restitution.

      F****** scumbag.

  • Why do the NRL react after the game is over. This shit has been happening all season and in this multi million dollar game they just keep getting it wrong. The bunker goes back to whatever suits them & I have no doubt their alias sports betting account looks a lot better due to it. Lets face it, The fans see it, The commentaors see it, The players on the field bring it up but it still they make the wrong decisions. Even though they can check it they don't. Also interesting how they pick and choose what they replay.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Brissy can you confirm this....when Stone passed that ball, and Klein pulled it up I'm sure Gutho wanted to challenge it but Klein said he can't challenge a forward pass. But Klein signalled a knock on, I'm confused.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Kudos to the club, Jim Sarantinos, and Matthew Beach for taking the bull by the horns after Team Lomax gave the NRL-registered agreement the middle finger.
The pressure-cooker for Lomax starts today in the Supreme Court, symbolically, at high noon.…"
10 minutes ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"One thing I do know is, sometimes the courts work in mysterious ways. You could have your T's crossed and i's dotted and still the courts find a way to punish you. Only winners here are the lawyers."
48 minutes ago
Joeyboyz replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"Exactly right Randy. The fact that this is going on for so long clearly shows that the NRL are going to back Melbourne and Lomax, otherwise they would have stepped in long ago and put a stop to this circus. Parra taking things to court was a great…"
1 hour ago
Alfred Mateo replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Hey Captain-thoughts on what Lomax' legal team will be using as their defence option? Restraint of trade? Signing agreement under duress? Virtually impossible to see how he wins this given he had legal representation when signing the agreement. Is…"
4 hours ago
More…