Allgood's Sinbinning

I was never really one who bought into the referees treating us so much differently but after seeing Allgood and Matai last night Im starting to wonder. Matai ran a good 20m to get up in Allgoods face and Allgood reacted. Not condoning fighting but its a physical sport and these things happen, as anyone whos played football can tell you. My major problem isn't that they have changed the rules is that once again, only OUR player gets sin binned. I thought the rule was anyone who throws a punch goes to the bin???? Are you telling me no manly player threw a punch?? I cant blame Allgood for having a go though as twice this season one of our players has been hit after a penalty's called and the refs say they cant reverse the decision, so after the whistle blew last night I think he thought what have I got to lose?

It didn't have any impact on who won but I do think the eels dropped their head after that and let through 2 tries in 5 minutes. Unfortunatley Allgood will probably get  3 - 4 weeks when other people like macguire and gallen get nothing or just 1 week.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • AllGood just got in before the judiciary. McGuire hit him in an almost identical way earlier in the season and got nothing. So I guess Mitch decided he'd get in first this time.

  • if allgood gets anything more than a week (a la mcgure) then parra have to take this to the top of the nrl cause its a joke!

    there is no fkn consistency or fairness meated out to the eels and i bet he gets heaps more time than those mentioned by mack! Im with ricky its bullsht!

  • Seeing as the swinging arm caused no harm to the Manly player it should have been play-on, just because there's intent doesn't mean it's a penalty if it misses then it doesn't matter, that's basically what Billy Harrigan said on another related incident with swinging arms. Allgood should have been sin-binned but so should have Matai, Allgood wouldn't have started throwing punches if Matai wasn't there so really Matai should have gotten more for being the third man in and exacerbating the situation.

    • ham - i would take it further to say that he was actually swinging for the ball as it actually popped out of beuhrers hands! the video is not conclusive that it was an attack on the man and in addition the referee was standing less than 2 metres from the incident, watched it, and didnt call any foul..... 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

SuperEel 22 replied to ParraEels's discussion How much longer is our apparel partnership with macron?
"I can ask regarding the manufacturer for 2026. I believe Macron is continuing however I was told there would be a new home jersey next year due to it being the 40 year anniversary of the 1986 premiership."
26 seconds ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Multiple shooter's ??? One armed man? The Devil made me do it? .....no the "devil" is in the detail.
Gee I am glad we are dealing with so many facts..... makes you lose confidence in "fake news". Who can you trust?
Luckily on one eyed eel we have…"
1 minute ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Am i understanding that he was "carrying the weapon"...... the qualification is "overt manner" does that imply he was carrying it for someone else? .......what's not adding up? what more do you need to know?.......is Tyler Robinson "innocent"?"
8 minutes ago
iamnot replied to ParraEels's discussion How much longer is our apparel partnership with macron?
"I wasn't a fan of the all-gold at the start of the year, as you say - I thought it needed blue shorts and socks. But I must admit it grew on me as the season went on. "
12 minutes ago
More…