Allgood's Sinbinning

I was never really one who bought into the referees treating us so much differently but after seeing Allgood and Matai last night Im starting to wonder. Matai ran a good 20m to get up in Allgoods face and Allgood reacted. Not condoning fighting but its a physical sport and these things happen, as anyone whos played football can tell you. My major problem isn't that they have changed the rules is that once again, only OUR player gets sin binned. I thought the rule was anyone who throws a punch goes to the bin???? Are you telling me no manly player threw a punch?? I cant blame Allgood for having a go though as twice this season one of our players has been hit after a penalty's called and the refs say they cant reverse the decision, so after the whistle blew last night I think he thought what have I got to lose?

It didn't have any impact on who won but I do think the eels dropped their head after that and let through 2 tries in 5 minutes. Unfortunatley Allgood will probably get  3 - 4 weeks when other people like macguire and gallen get nothing or just 1 week.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • AllGood just got in before the judiciary. McGuire hit him in an almost identical way earlier in the season and got nothing. So I guess Mitch decided he'd get in first this time.

  • if allgood gets anything more than a week (a la mcgure) then parra have to take this to the top of the nrl cause its a joke!

    there is no fkn consistency or fairness meated out to the eels and i bet he gets heaps more time than those mentioned by mack! Im with ricky its bullsht!

  • Seeing as the swinging arm caused no harm to the Manly player it should have been play-on, just because there's intent doesn't mean it's a penalty if it misses then it doesn't matter, that's basically what Billy Harrigan said on another related incident with swinging arms. Allgood should have been sin-binned but so should have Matai, Allgood wouldn't have started throwing punches if Matai wasn't there so really Matai should have gotten more for being the third man in and exacerbating the situation.

    • ham - i would take it further to say that he was actually swinging for the ball as it actually popped out of beuhrers hands! the video is not conclusive that it was an attack on the man and in addition the referee was standing less than 2 metres from the incident, watched it, and didnt call any foul..... 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

macybrown replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R7 v Dogs: The M*A*S*H Unit (UPSET W38-20 WOW)
"Absolutely, having great consistent defenders in the second row made a huge difference overall . Helped our composure so much. give me that any day in preference to a player like Kelma who is clearly not keen on the tough stuff as he has shown this…"
3 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Poppa's discussion The Unicorns Strike Back
"Nice memories fellows, helps keeping them fresh, when talking about them this way as LB said. Mannah your Dad passing not very long ago would make it very difficult, you have my empathy with your thoughts.
My middle son 49 years old is the most avid…"
5 minutes ago
Carlos Marrickvillian replied to Blue Eel's discussion Eels V Dogs 3-2-1
"Honestly hard to split, the whole team deserves at least a 1!3 - Will Penisini – I think it was his best ever game for us.2 - Junior – His best game for us this year. He was the dominate forward on the field today.1 - Saxon for such a strong…"
8 minutes ago
macybrown replied to Blue Eel's discussion Eels V Dogs 3-2-1
"With 'ya there! Exactly what we need."
11 minutes ago
More…