You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Sorry but as much as I love him as a player and the energy he brings to the team, he has to go. The Club must have standards. We gave him another opportunity after stuff up number one and he repays the Club by doing it again. He got his chance and…"
"But James Hooper has been arguing the Eels have stuffed their cap for years because, wait for it, they signed Luai for 2027 (whom the Eels are only paying $700k of his $1.2 million salary).
It's almost as if James Hooper always speaks total…"
It's almost as if James Hooper always speaks total…"
" Shhhhh , Don't let Moses get wind of this. He'll have his hand out again. "
"No i understand going for both, but sounds we want both as in if we get Best we want Bostock too.I know you go for both in case you miss one."
Replies
No! Save the Fox!
Im in 100% favour in axing him. Not only did he break the trust in the club giving him a chance to continue his career, but he now has cost the club half a season without a prominent winger and are now scrambling to replace him.
He should go 100% and I think it will be announced this week
Will only get axed if there is a replacement coming in. Let's see what happens.
Letting him go possibly puts us in a worse position (notwithstanding the suspension he will have to serve). Our backs are junk and he's one ot the better ones. Talk about bite your nose to spite your face.
I want him to stay. I'd rather stand by our mate.
Parra keeping him is a better PR story. He serves his suspension and then gets drug tested every week.
It's a terrible PR story mate. Especially when the next kid with less ability is sacked. They simply can't and won't keep him on. Like everyone , from a team talent perspective I couldn't care less if a player stole the Christmas presents from Ronald McDonald house. But from a culture and standards perspective for the long term of the club, they must punt the ungrateful dope. Very Selfish human , certainly not a good enough commitment for a club in our predicament. He won't be missed , and we'll be far better off for removing him. I remember the world ending when Hayne left, we became a far better " team " for it. Sacking JAC will lift the standards we accept.
Punt him. It's not a pub football team, it's a profession , a workplace , sure if he'd like to hang around and play a season for minimum wage to pay his dues to the club, maybe Ill have a different perspective. But as it stands , my understanding is the clubs expected to finance his suspension very handsomely , which sets a horrendous example for the future young players and those around him who didn't go and hit the bags and drive because , well, they're dedicated to the club and it's rules.
My only options for him are to sit out without pay, or sign a new far reduced contract, otherwise , see ya . You can hit the bags and drive all you like brah....
We are not a charity or a fucking bucks party . He has zero respect for Ryles, or our club. To put it bluntly , for me it's like if somome cheats on their partner. If you take them back the first time then that's one thing , hard choice , but hey some people do it. Take them back a second time , you look like a fucking idiot and they're NEVER respect you. And people will rightfully say you're a dope.
Drug driving is a ridiculous offence for a adult especially earning his coin. And TWICE ,
Sorry but as much as I love him as a player and the energy he brings to the team, he has to go. The Club must have standards. We gave him another opportunity after stuff up number one and he repays the Club by doing it again. He got his chance and threw it back in the face of his team and the Club. All you people defending him, would you feel the same if he killed one of your family members full of cocaine, not once, but again? See JAC, sadly you made your bed, time to go and lie in it.