2026 Disrupter Rule - Why wasn't this a penalty to the Eels?

Why wasn't this a penatly against the Broncos last night?

The new aerial contest rules state that to catch or bat the ball back, players must use two hands. Using one hand to slap the ball down is a penatly.

In realtime it was a little difficult to judge, however the contest was sent up to the video ref as a no-try onfield decision as a knock on against Broncos.

Video ref then rules "Kotoni Staggs goes up with two hands..."

Genuine question: What defines "going up with two hands"?

 

31103535473?profile=RESIZE_584x

 

 

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Even more interesting is why the hell it was a knock on against us!

    The bunker has simply turned into a ref decision vindication machine.

  • "goes up with two hands" (as per Bunker ref statement) does not equal "an attempt to catch using two hands".

    Does anybody have the actual rule?

     

  • 1. The rule is dumb and incredibly vague.

    2. It's a coin toss decision

    3. According to The Bunker in this game, basically making it look like you're going to go with 2 hands is good enough.

    Can't wait for this stupid rule to ruin a rep/finals game.

  • If the purpose of the rule is to not have "one hand interfering with the opposition player", it should be worded as such.

  • The ref's stated that because Staggs was escorted in his run, that he wasn't able to contest the ball properly.   

    • thanks Chief

       

    • That also was a bullshit call ....hardly touched him.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Angry Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Ashley Klein's $400K gambling problem
"I just hope the NRL has investigated it and is monitoring his accounts (including bank accounts) and he is squeeky clean"
1 minute ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion The Ticking Time Bomb
"Cracker couple of responses here Cap not only does Ryles need it but BA needed it also.
Whats happening now is just magnifying something that's been there for years.The complete lack of a plan and championship dna within the club.If we haven't got…"
2 minutes ago
Frankie Fong replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Ashley Klein's $400K gambling problem
"1000% correct.  V'/Landys might have done  well with the games finances but has killed the spectical of the game with his constant rule changes which are all designed for the NRL have a big say on results."
3 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Ashley Klein's $400K gambling problem
"Now it's saying it's on Greyhounds and Horses. They have gone through his betting and nothing on NRL. Now if the case, still doesn't look good. "
5 minutes ago
More…