2002 V 2009

I was thinking about these two years and the Canterbury Bulldogs and Melbourne Salary Cap scandals/rorts.     I know I may be clutching at straws and taking a big leap, but why did the Roosters get the benefit of the Canterbury Bulldogs cheating and we didnt.

The bulldogs where far and away the best team in 2002 with only 3 matches lost in the regular season and then where deducted 37 points.   I know the Roosters still had to get there to the GF but cmon the Warriors in the GF, they were never going to win that.   Yet we get pumped by a cheating team and get diddly squat awarded, if not the premiership at least the cash.  In the Olympics, all these eastern block drug cheats are getting their medals stripped and then awarded to the people who came in the  2nd 3rd etc.

Just my thoughts ,  I guess I must be in a 40 year dillerium, but I still think in 2009 we deserved better considering how we got to the GF.  Yet the Roosters benefit and we get F all.

Anyway as always GO PARRA.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Absolutely clutching at straws we were rubbish in 02 and scrapped into the 8.

    To many variables could you guarantee we win if Melbourne didn't play do we beat the broncos who lost the preliminary final?

    Write list in 07 to the storm do we beat manly?

     

    To many what ifs? That is the issue 

  • The main difference is the timing of when both teams were caught. If storm were caught before the GF they would've been stripped of their points and pick up a spoon, just like the dogs.

    It does nothing to award us the comp in retrospect. I was there in 09 and nothing will replace the feeling of leaving the stadium having been beaten.

    • Yep x2

  • Its a fair point, if the winner gets disqualified the runner up moves up. We were cheated out of a premiership by the Storm. They still have the rings and celebrate the win. We should have at least got the cash. 

    What happened in previous years is irrelevant. We lost to cheaters and got nothing.

    • it is what it is. but what irks me is ,that the storm still claim it as a win , and had a replica trophy made up and display it. too me thats the height of arrogance

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Wizardssleeves official receipts replied to Eelawarra's discussion RYLES REVEALS WHY HE SIGNED PEZET FOR ONE YEAR
"He had the clause so he could play NRL .  I think we are getting carried away suggesting he wants his very own team and that's the be all and end all of why he chose Brisbane.   
So if something happens and Brisbane sign an experienced player to…"
38 minutes ago
Bob Smith replied to Eelawarra's discussion RYLES REVEALS WHY HE SIGNED PEZET FOR ONE YEAR
"Does your mum know you're on the internet?"
44 minutes ago
BEM replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Jonah Pezet Deal: An Optical Illusion?
"I agree 100% Adam.
This benifits Pezet and the Broncos.
I think some people are that starved of success that they believe Ryles can do no wrong.
Pezet is a halfback, not a 5/8.
The Storm knew this which is why Wishart covered for Munster and Pezet…"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Papenhuyzen Quits Storm
"If he is leaving it would be v.impolite of him not to tell us well before Nov1.
Very impolite indeed
 "
1 hour ago
More…