I remember a couple of weeks ago there was a post about a massive signing that was happening. A few people were saying it was some guy being a hero and that apparently BA was peed off about the leaked info. The blog was then deleted. Anyone know any further about this?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • We are signing Woods apparently . Maybe the leak ruined the deal hahha.
    • That would be laughable if that was the case. Another embarrassment for the Eels
  • Yes there was a few TCT tweets from Mitch - M, regarding 4 signings and one of those a 'massive' signing, they were asked to remove the tweets according to some, the blog that chief put up here screenshoting the tweet was removed too. im not surprised Brads pissed off if thats the case.

    • Thanks snake. So is there any further info??
    • Hey snake what you hers about james grahem
  • No idea mate

  • Nothing's happening with it mate. If there was a confirmed "massive" signing when the original blog was released, the 10 day cooling off period would have elapsed and the signing announced officially. It's just more rumour and speculation about possible signings.

    Just wait for the follow up "I told you so" blog in a few months when any player signs, regardless of it being massive or not.
    • Yeah that sounds about right. But I must say everything that transpired with the deleted blogs etc tells me there was something to it
    • If it was more than a rumour or an approach to a player's manager, it'd be confirmed by now. I'm sure the club has approached hundreds of players over the years, if it doesn't progress past that it's just speculation.
    • Or the 'I told you announcing the signing on Twitter via a third party and reposting on a blog site would jeopardise the deal and it's fallen through' line. Like player agents and their clients are trawling fans sites..... please
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R2 v Broncos: Back on the Horse
"So you saying to take away our best attacking player, besides Moses, out of his role to cover Hooker? And my comment was ridiculous? Walker can definately fill at Hooker, and to demean me by commenting that a Lock is better to fill in at Hooker, of…"
13 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R2 v Broncos: Back on the Horse
"I do not think you should  be shouting at Junior NOT BEING A BALL PLAYER John.
There is no doubt he is a ball player, one of his great strengths actually, did you not see him playing for Samoa. That said and in defence of your view, there is a time…"
17 minutes ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R2 v Broncos: Back on the Horse
"Playing a lock at Hooker is a hell of a lot petter than the smallest player in the league who is a fringe first grader in the middle of the field. What a ridiculous thing to say. "
1 hour ago
TolEllts replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R2 v Broncos: Back on the Horse
"Try to complete the sets and avoid dumb and lazy penalties and 6 agains. Team should stay calm and trust their defensive lines. No one should play hero and come out of the defensive line which Kelly did several times. Stop pushing passes and they do…"
1 hour ago
More…