I remember a couple of weeks ago there was a post about a massive signing that was happening. A few people were saying it was some guy being a hero and that apparently BA was peed off about the leaked info. The blog was then deleted. Anyone know any further about this?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • We are signing Woods apparently . Maybe the leak ruined the deal hahha.
    • That would be laughable if that was the case. Another embarrassment for the Eels
  • Yes there was a few TCT tweets from Mitch - M, regarding 4 signings and one of those a 'massive' signing, they were asked to remove the tweets according to some, the blog that chief put up here screenshoting the tweet was removed too. im not surprised Brads pissed off if thats the case.

    • Thanks snake. So is there any further info??
    • Hey snake what you hers about james grahem
  • No idea mate

  • Nothing's happening with it mate. If there was a confirmed "massive" signing when the original blog was released, the 10 day cooling off period would have elapsed and the signing announced officially. It's just more rumour and speculation about possible signings.

    Just wait for the follow up "I told you so" blog in a few months when any player signs, regardless of it being massive or not.
    • Yeah that sounds about right. But I must say everything that transpired with the deleted blogs etc tells me there was something to it
    • If it was more than a rumour or an approach to a player's manager, it'd be confirmed by now. I'm sure the club has approached hundreds of players over the years, if it doesn't progress past that it's just speculation.
    • Or the 'I told you announcing the signing on Twitter via a third party and reposting on a blog site would jeopardise the deal and it's fallen through' line. Like player agents and their clients are trawling fans sites..... please
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"The bigger pictures is the opportunity to send a message saying to clubs PAs and alike this sought of agitation isn't acceptable in no shape or form.Thats more so where I'd be going if I'm PVL.
Back the club here that's shown good faith releasing…"
2 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Great analogy LB.
Pretty much they want him for nothing but I'm confident Jim's got a handle on this and he's out front on this he doesn't need to say more he's outlined the clubs position has the legal grounding there's not much PVL can do even if…"
9 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"How do you figure that?  The transfer fee does not effect the cap, its just accumalated revenue, the cap stays as it is now, non inclusive of Lomax,  plus it would be a once only payment, doesn't effect future years.
Sorry Iamnot, not trying to pick…"
11 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"NBA all contracts are available to public and teams have to show that finances aren't dodgy. They miles ahead of the nrl lol"
14 minutes ago
More…