I remember a couple of weeks ago there was a post about a massive signing that was happening. A few people were saying it was some guy being a hero and that apparently BA was peed off about the leaked info. The blog was then deleted. Anyone know any further about this?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • We are signing Woods apparently . Maybe the leak ruined the deal hahha.
    • That would be laughable if that was the case. Another embarrassment for the Eels
  • Yes there was a few TCT tweets from Mitch - M, regarding 4 signings and one of those a 'massive' signing, they were asked to remove the tweets according to some, the blog that chief put up here screenshoting the tweet was removed too. im not surprised Brads pissed off if thats the case.

    • Thanks snake. So is there any further info??
    • Hey snake what you hers about james grahem
  • No idea mate

  • Nothing's happening with it mate. If there was a confirmed "massive" signing when the original blog was released, the 10 day cooling off period would have elapsed and the signing announced officially. It's just more rumour and speculation about possible signings.

    Just wait for the follow up "I told you so" blog in a few months when any player signs, regardless of it being massive or not.
    • Yeah that sounds about right. But I must say everything that transpired with the deleted blogs etc tells me there was something to it
    • If it was more than a rumour or an approach to a player's manager, it'd be confirmed by now. I'm sure the club has approached hundreds of players over the years, if it doesn't progress past that it's just speculation.
    • Or the 'I told you announcing the signing on Twitter via a third party and reposting on a blog site would jeopardise the deal and it's fallen through' line. Like player agents and their clients are trawling fans sites..... please
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

D_STOFFBERG replied to Herbert Hamilton's discussion Fight off spoon again
""
5 minutes ago
Yobz replied to Yobz's discussion 2026 Disrupter Rule - Why wasn't this a penalty to the Eels?
"If the purpose of the rule is to not have "one hand interfering with the opposition player", it should be worded as such."
17 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Yobz's discussion 2026 Disrupter Rule - Why wasn't this a penalty to the Eels?
"1. The rule is dumb and incredibly vague.
2. It's a coin toss decision
3. According to The Bunker in this game, basically making it look like you're going to go with 2 hands is good enough.
Can't wait for this stupid rule to ruin a rep/finals game."
21 minutes ago
LB replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Greatest Eels Comebacks?
"Yeah Cheyse Blair run at the end.
I remember people saying why did Benji kick the FG. Lol the bastard understood the assignment."
24 minutes ago
More…