According to Danny weidler 2 year 500k per year deal. But he also says in the very next sentence that those terms could be false just what he's heard.
Edit: The club has now confirmed
|
|
|
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"I saw a reel with hammer and Herbie heading out on the boat to go fishing. How do we offer that at Parramatta? Tom Gilbert was interviewed by MMM radio the other week and they asked him what he does the morning of the game. He was walking along the…"
"Is it really relevant who should have won the game because they didn't take their opportunities?
That should play no part whatsoever in the referee's officiating by the referee. They need to apply the rules irrespective of what should have done ,…"
That should play no part whatsoever in the referee's officiating by the referee. They need to apply the rules irrespective of what should have done ,…"
"They got shafted a couple of times for sure, but they had enough ball and enough chances to smash the knights. Their halves in my mind, are almost completely to blame for the loss. Wether from deep in own half or in the attacking zone, the warriors…"
"Warriors halves were ordinary. That's where they lost the game.
Warriors were also lucky not to be penalised more. They had blockers a few times protecting the catcher under high ball. Also, the guy who hit Ponga in the head early in the game would…"
Warriors were also lucky not to be penalised more. They had blockers a few times protecting the catcher under high ball. Also, the guy who hit Ponga in the head early in the game would…"
Replies
He removed his post, basically said it was $500k per season and it should leave the working about money to those that understand it.
Weidler later put a comment out saying it was the $500K for the 2 years, not per year.
I don't know why I removed it or even if I did.....context was the heading in blog of 500 per year. Still confused by that when reading it. That is maybe why I removed it...can't remember.
I think I was also confused by the discussion on Junior at 750 for a season and at one point mixing that up with the Volkman discussion out of context.
Context of leaving it to the people who understand the money was the cap implications.
Its all good.
I know the implication was that it was $500k per season but I found that highly unlikely and was seeking confirmation.
It was higher than I expected, but everyone was so diverse on it....of course no one actually knows, I reckon it might be more than 250 justifiably and less than 500, pluck the mioddle at 375 and I reckon he may even be happy.....as someone said he would have been on the base 120k but he would have hit a few KPI's during the course of this year, so I at least hoped his take home got up around the 250 for this year. I honestly have no idea how that works.....
If it's $250k I reckon his agent has failed him a little, that's a win for the eels.
Only if he could've gotten substantially more. Which it seems he couldn't. But I agree in theory if you'd told me he got 350 I don't think anyone would think it's overs , but, we also don't know what his priorities are . Or if the 250 includes some juicy bonus's.
Surley not lol. Then again, this is Parramatta and we need to spend our cap somehow.
Great stuff, I would rather be over paying a back up half that has the potential to be your future starter than be over paying a few plodders just meet to top 30 and salary cap requirements.
Great statement JC, I totally agree with that appraisal
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
of 14 Next