Replies

  • Wtf 2 weeks for touching a reff. Lol they high 5
  • It certainly makes you wonder........

  • What the hickety heck????!!!!
  • That is seriously messed up! I can't say I am surprised though
  • Nice Professional look from an Un-Professional organisation.

    Todd Greenburg will brush it under the carpet and pretend as if he never saw it.

     

  • This reall needs to be questioned sent further. Players were missing games for touching refs last year. This is clearly a bad look on the game and shows they were defiantly against us this game.
    • Good point! so nrl like isn’t it... even yesterday’s taboo rule is always old news a few months later 

  • Hmmmmm... I am usually the first to say the refs aren't corrupt. I usually put their mistakes down to human error, poor judgement, laziness, stupidity, lack of awareness etc.

    But I can't defend this. I am at a loss. This is disgusting. I hope they come out and explain it because I love my footy and this is hurts.
    • No matter what reasons the NRL give for this incident, none of them are of a professional nature!

      Officials should be made to identify players by number only, as well. Total garbage to expect to be called Sir after approaching a player with "Ay Clinton!" An exception would be the Captain.

      Hi fiving, low fiving, secret handshakes, winking, etc. between officials and players is absurd! I'm all for the ban on players touching officials but why the double standards here? 

      Also bullshit is the coaching some players receive during play! Statements like "you've been offside the last 3 tackles" or "I won't warn you again"  is hard to hear when we're behind! The refs counting penalties and discussing on-field performance is another joke!

      • Pretty sure Brisbane got warned 3 times last night that if they gave another penalty someone would be binned. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Bourbon Man replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"In fairness, I've been guilty of poor conduct in the past. I'm now making a point of not doing that anymore."
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"HOE, it's possible for attacks on ideas to be attacks on people. It can be a fine line. But we can test the line. The test is to ask if the premise of an attack relates to some aspect of the identity of a person making a claim, or to the…"
1 hour ago
Bourbon Man replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Couldn't agree more Daz. 
Not wanting to make it sound political, but, this is what the "right wing" / "real Australians" / "non-politically correct" / "anti-woke" crowd carry on with. They shit can everyone they don't agree with and when they get…"
2 hours ago
Bourbon Man replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"On the topic of moderation, there's something I think needs to be absolutely spelled out.
In a perfect world, we wouldn't need moderation because we would all be responsbile enough to engage in robust debat, sometimes quite vigorous debate, possibly…"
2 hours ago
More…