Replies

  • Wtf 2 weeks for touching a reff. Lol they high 5
  • It certainly makes you wonder........

  • What the hickety heck????!!!!
  • That is seriously messed up! I can't say I am surprised though
  • Nice Professional look from an Un-Professional organisation.

    Todd Greenburg will brush it under the carpet and pretend as if he never saw it.

     

  • This reall needs to be questioned sent further. Players were missing games for touching refs last year. This is clearly a bad look on the game and shows they were defiantly against us this game.
    • Good point! so nrl like isn’t it... even yesterday’s taboo rule is always old news a few months later 

  • Hmmmmm... I am usually the first to say the refs aren't corrupt. I usually put their mistakes down to human error, poor judgement, laziness, stupidity, lack of awareness etc.

    But I can't defend this. I am at a loss. This is disgusting. I hope they come out and explain it because I love my footy and this is hurts.
    • No matter what reasons the NRL give for this incident, none of them are of a professional nature!

      Officials should be made to identify players by number only, as well. Total garbage to expect to be called Sir after approaching a player with "Ay Clinton!" An exception would be the Captain.

      Hi fiving, low fiving, secret handshakes, winking, etc. between officials and players is absurd! I'm all for the ban on players touching officials but why the double standards here? 

      Also bullshit is the coaching some players receive during play! Statements like "you've been offside the last 3 tackles" or "I won't warn you again"  is hard to hear when we're behind! The refs counting penalties and discussing on-field performance is another joke!

      • Pretty sure Brisbane got warned 3 times last night that if they gave another penalty someone would be binned. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poppa replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"You can appeal a Supreme Court ruling, typically by taking the case to a higher court such as the Court of Appeal (a division of the Supreme Court) or the High Court of Australia. Appeals generally require demonstrating an error of law, new…"
7 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
""The purpose of the article was to be an article"
I know Daz is a professor and subtle as a sledge hammer but even that statement would make him think he has backed the wrong Donkey! LOL
PS I missed the media training and Axel noticed the subtlties…"
34 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Well Daz, it is well known that the ABC is left leaning and I thought the facist NRL/ARL would be the target for the ABC, surely not our little David with a slingshot Parramatta Boomerang!. 
Of all the news outlets you can come up with I would have…"
39 minutes ago
Muttman replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Spagnolo launches another campaign to undermine the club
"Got it. Thanks mate. "
53 minutes ago
More…