Replies

  • Wtf 2 weeks for touching a reff. Lol they high 5
  • It certainly makes you wonder........

  • What the hickety heck????!!!!
  • That is seriously messed up! I can't say I am surprised though
  • Nice Professional look from an Un-Professional organisation.

    Todd Greenburg will brush it under the carpet and pretend as if he never saw it.

     

  • This reall needs to be questioned sent further. Players were missing games for touching refs last year. This is clearly a bad look on the game and shows they were defiantly against us this game.
    • Good point! so nrl like isn’t it... even yesterday’s taboo rule is always old news a few months later 

  • Hmmmmm... I am usually the first to say the refs aren't corrupt. I usually put their mistakes down to human error, poor judgement, laziness, stupidity, lack of awareness etc.

    But I can't defend this. I am at a loss. This is disgusting. I hope they come out and explain it because I love my footy and this is hurts.
    • No matter what reasons the NRL give for this incident, none of them are of a professional nature!

      Officials should be made to identify players by number only, as well. Total garbage to expect to be called Sir after approaching a player with "Ay Clinton!" An exception would be the Captain.

      Hi fiving, low fiving, secret handshakes, winking, etc. between officials and players is absurd! I'm all for the ban on players touching officials but why the double standards here? 

      Also bullshit is the coaching some players receive during play! Statements like "you've been offside the last 3 tackles" or "I won't warn you again"  is hard to hear when we're behind! The refs counting penalties and discussing on-field performance is another joke!

      • Pretty sure Brisbane got warned 3 times last night that if they gave another penalty someone would be binned. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Clintorian replied to Charbs's discussion Storm to face hefty bill if star loses Eels court fight
"How good would it be if the Storm lose the case, and then the NRL consider that part of Storm's salary cap as payment to Lomax 😆"
20 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion SMH Report: Storm, Raiders & Perth Allegedly All Interested In Signing Lomax
"Right so they are getting to the point of hushing up Parra. Chan is ok but I would want a Flegg talent too.
Howarth is a real possibility if Lomax takes his Centre spot. Push for him and take Matto."
24 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Charbs's discussion Storm to face hefty bill if star loses Eels court fight
"The switch to the Storm for 2026 onwards has been reportedly valued at $1 million
What?
The?
Fuck?
How could Melbourne possibly put him on the books for a mil? "TPA's"?"
32 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Johnny Suede's discussion SMH Report: Storm, Raiders & Perth Allegedly All Interested In Signing Lomax
"No, my point is more about Lomax's team saying they had exhausted all the opportunities they had on the table with the other NRL teams that were interested, none were, and the only offer came from Storm. Then they could say Parra are restricting…"
40 minutes ago
More…