You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Muttman, you do realise players (via their managers) like to test their value on the open market before committing to a new contract. For all we know, the club may have offered Russell a deal commensurate with his value to the team mid way through…"
"👍. I don't think Russell has been first grade material up untill this year. That is based on that he would have to keep improving. I can't get out of my head that great chip and chase to score. He had a blinder that day. But he needs to do that type…"
"Russell could have been tied up before the Bears even had a shot at him. When you consistently allow players in your top 17 to shop themselves around you're going to lose them to higher bidders. No one is suggesting we over pay for Russell. More…"
"Just because of the sheer volume of recruitment and retention 'experts' who said MON should be fired for NOT paying overs for Russell, that 44-66 minute period also featured:
Russell lazy marker defense and chase permits Manly a long break, leads to…"
Russell lazy marker defense and chase permits Manly a long break, leads to…"
Replies
Once again the govt goes with set agenda to make a handful of people happy without proper planning or forethought.
Why not make a Stadium which allows for adding of a roof in years time when more funds are available if not doing it now.
I said before The new stadium at Parramatta was started that it required a retractable roof. This was poo-pood by the "experts" Now that the stadium is flooded they have gone rather quiet. The company building the new More Park stadium refused on the weekend to say that fans seated under the roof would remain dry during rain.! These stadiums are being built to get the conservative state government elected in 2019. That is the plan. Let us hope that the law of unintended consequences prevails.
Once the cranes are removed and the state of the art drainage installed there'll be absolutely no issues. There actually an automated drainage system going in that will be like none other in this country
LOL Robbie theres no drainage yet.
Here is the Business Case from Infrastructure NSW... unless you know otherwise.
Infrastructure NSW has summarised the Final Business Case for the development of the SFS at Moore Park.
The Business Case considered three options for the redevelopment of the SFS, against a "do minimum” Base Case. The three options include (1) refurbishment of the existing stadium, (2) “new build” with 40,000 seats, and (3) “new build” with 45,000 seats.
In summary, the Business Case clearly demonstrates that rebuilding the SFS, with either 40,000 or 45,000 seats is a better option than refurbishing the existing venue. The quantifiable economic benefits of a new stadium fall slightly short of the economic costs.
However, the unsustainable nature of the alternative to do only enough work to keep the stadium open, suggests that rebuilding is an acceptable option. Click here to view it in full.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next