You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Yes for me! Prefer Barnett over kman from souths which some people on here were willing to pay 1.2 million and sneeze at 800k for Barnett. Hopefully he is the same after knee injury and we get good use out of him. Shame we lose samrani in the…"
"So if we land him, next year we'll have Dad's Army in our forward pack. Jr, JDB, Walker and Barnett
Lets hope he chooses Broncos over us. Don't want to lose Samrani and $860k for 3 years would basically mean we won't be shopping for any top line 5/8…"
Lets hope he chooses Broncos over us. Don't want to lose Samrani and $860k for 3 years would basically mean we won't be shopping for any top line 5/8…"
"The Warriors are trying to do the right thing by Barnett who is asking to leave on compassionate grounds - so the Wah's are never going to get a dream swap. The names being floated are pretty mid but I guess they're better than nothing."
"I have a sneaky feeling tago might come to parra."
Replies
Once again the govt goes with set agenda to make a handful of people happy without proper planning or forethought.
Why not make a Stadium which allows for adding of a roof in years time when more funds are available if not doing it now.
I said before The new stadium at Parramatta was started that it required a retractable roof. This was poo-pood by the "experts" Now that the stadium is flooded they have gone rather quiet. The company building the new More Park stadium refused on the weekend to say that fans seated under the roof would remain dry during rain.! These stadiums are being built to get the conservative state government elected in 2019. That is the plan. Let us hope that the law of unintended consequences prevails.
Once the cranes are removed and the state of the art drainage installed there'll be absolutely no issues. There actually an automated drainage system going in that will be like none other in this country
LOL Robbie theres no drainage yet.
Here is the Business Case from Infrastructure NSW... unless you know otherwise.
Infrastructure NSW has summarised the Final Business Case for the development of the SFS at Moore Park.
The Business Case considered three options for the redevelopment of the SFS, against a "do minimum” Base Case. The three options include (1) refurbishment of the existing stadium, (2) “new build” with 40,000 seats, and (3) “new build” with 45,000 seats.
In summary, the Business Case clearly demonstrates that rebuilding the SFS, with either 40,000 or 45,000 seats is a better option than refurbishing the existing venue. The quantifiable economic benefits of a new stadium fall slightly short of the economic costs.
However, the unsustainable nature of the alternative to do only enough work to keep the stadium open, suggests that rebuilding is an acceptable option. Click here to view it in full.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next