You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Same goes for Hopgood, he punches through the line and is ready to offload looking for support and there is no one. So frustrating. This is where we are missing a zippy fullback who is on the ball at all times."
"X2, but a lot of this is basic stuff BA just doesn't get, his gameplan is effort on effort, and if we don't hold possession we lose, without Moses' kicking it's exposed this badly. "
"Parra's weakness is there back 5 that's where they are the slowest least athletic team in the league.
The fact they haven't invested or have development that is key to them winning the battle in the middle of the field is the Achilles heal of this…"
The fact they haven't invested or have development that is key to them winning the battle in the middle of the field is the Achilles heal of this…"
" Great Article exposing something where you can learn from disappointments in being at the bottom of the ladder in what you do. Sometimes being in that place can be a good place to be to have a clearer view on how to progress. If you are midfield…"
Replies
I really don't think this is a case for shooting the messenger. He's got a job to do, there is waaay to much detail in this story for it to be inaccurate. Let's be realistic and if this was any other club, we'd be baying for the four points to come off.
PS I wrote that to you as we all know you read this site as part of your "investigative journalsim" fkn poser
One of my first editors stuck a poster-size message on the wall in front of my desk.
It said: "News is something that someone, somewhere doesn't want to see printed. All the rest is advertising".
And as a young journalist who took that mantra to heart and subsequently got called a whole bunch of names, I just get narked when people take aim at the reporter for doing their job.
I had a pretty standard comeback: "If you hadn't of fucked up, I couldn't have written the story".
It's probably pretty applicable here, I'd suggest.
And as we know, every company in the world is ultimately owned by Halliburton.
Not true Pou - Halliburton is a fully owned subsidiary of Vandelay Industries, whose parent is of course Kramerica Industries - thus, technically, every corporation is ultimately owned by Kramerica Industries :))
Gotta be a conflict of interest in there somewhere mate.
Incorrect. It's business as usual here at Kramerica Industries.