New coach

Ran into Michael McGuire said y don’t u coach parra he said they haven’t called him lol wld u call him for a coaching role n bring smith in as a football manager role n ship on Norman for carney on a one yr deal extension if he gets us in 8 next year

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Was Gwunta sending you selfie pics again Marky???? Taking dick pics to a whole new level.

    • Nice cap.

    • Thats one bald nob
    • Lol.......I know some chicks, and some blokes, that would line up to have a crack at that knob.

  • I said it when they hired Kidwell I think he is Bernie’s plan b if he has to cut ba. As they say careful what your u wish for as I can’t see Kidwell being much better than ba but obviously something has to change and change fast. Knowing Parra as we all do they will probably beat the donkeys next week and the cycle continues... ah the life of a Parra supporter 

  • kidwell is our defensive coach.
    Who’s our attacking coach????
    • Arthur is attacking coach
    • Roosters have JT as their attacking coach.
      If we can’t get rid of Arthur from what I’m
      hearing, let’s get an attacking coach. We need it badly
    • Yeah Arthur’s attack is not creative very boring
    • Steve murphy

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Coryn Hughes replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"In all essence this case is very black n white but Lomax's lawyers will be looking for avenues that will highlight different that's the key here is for us not to get drawn into the Lomax arguement but to stay on track and highlight what's been…"
1 hour ago
Clintorian replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Not to mention all the other teams in Rugby he could be playing in."
5 hours ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
7 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
7 hours ago
More…