Replies

  • giphy.gif

  • lipflap.gif

  • jZQyo.gif

  • 3320938706?profile=original

  • 2861432129?profile=original

    • why bring vaughton in to the eels site?

  • 3320911369?profile=original

  • 3320931974?profile=original

  • Ok, let's bite here for argument sake.

    Say Fogarty plays off the bench as the #14. What role does he play? 
    Are you going to take off Bevan French, Clint Gutherson or Corey Norman to allow him to play? 

    Before I put forth why it wouldn't work, let me allow you to firstly say why you think Fogarty as the 14 would work and where and how you would play him within the 80-minute confine of the game. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Probably believed he was worth more is more likely right. However that is on him. He could have went to Parramatta and said "Hey, since i have signed with you i have played Origin 2 years in a row and toured for Australia, could we look into an…"
6 minutes ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"We did the opposite of restrain his trade, we encouraged and facilitated his trade. However, this is not about winning or losing of Lomax plays NRL again in the next 3 seasons. This is about us receiving something in return for his services. Under…"
16 minutes ago
LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Lol Lomax cried to the NRL, Melbourne did also. Never been told no in a long time. Gallop did once and got abused by many in the game for doing the right thing. "
24 minutes ago
LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"I doubt it as outside the NRL would include SL even. Union, AFL, UFC, Boxing, Golf even. If R360 didn't eventuate there is an ample amount of opportunities still there."
25 minutes ago
More…