Did the Panthers vs Storm game destroy our excuses

Excuse 1: Penalties- panthers smashed by referee calls all first half. They hung in there and came our winners.Excuse 2: injuries- storm decimated by injuries and were still a competitive NRL standard team.Excuse 3: poor ol' Brad Arthur doesn't have rep quality players at his disposal.- storm were without there Queensland fullback, centre and five/eighth, not to mention playing with their third string halfback (probably the most important position. Despite all that they were still NRL standard.We have no excuses. We just plain suck.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • There can be no excuse for a 18 loss and 6 win year.
  • It's only the unicorns that are making excuses for themselves. They are a bunch of losers and whinging dork boys. They are a disgrace to this once great club. They need to stand up for themselves,  grow a pair of balls & stop accepting mediocrity.

    Stop whinging, moaning & groaning, get a life and make yourself accountable for your actions. The great Jack Gibson would have loved to give you lovely boys a nice slapping across the head.

    •  Chief: They have got it wrong for five years and will get it wrong for the next five years.

  • I’m still confident of a 5 year plan
    • When does the 5 years start?
  • Porn !  Suspension !  Khags is only 12 and this is a violation of his rights !

    • GEE-BLOODY-ZUZ Chief - if you call that porn no wonder you lot are satisfied with the Eels performances.

  • penrith fluke trys , steal game.
    • The harder you play the LUCKIER you get.

      Pennies made their own luck sonny and it was NO fluke they won.

    • I used to think that too but they do it far too often for it to be fluke or luck.
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"No time to play pool when Ninja's are about.
I have seen a bloke get a star stuck in his head...it's not as bad as it looks and can leave you in better condition than a pool ball from 10ft"
3 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"It would NOT be subjudice for Vlandys to state that they consider a contract, which they registered, binding sans a court intervention...thats a furphy
 "
8 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"I would hire a guy that is just as big...ummm.errr..The call to your mate may be cut short by the ashtray's arrival.
V'handys wants WWE. Lets give him a show. Drag him into the ring and hit him with a fucking chair till he goes tits-up.
Hoe…"
20 minutes ago
Acme replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Do you mean 2027? Or are you just defiantly holding your ground 😁"
36 minutes ago
More…