Did the Panthers vs Storm game destroy our excuses

Excuse 1: Penalties- panthers smashed by referee calls all first half. They hung in there and came our winners.Excuse 2: injuries- storm decimated by injuries and were still a competitive NRL standard team.Excuse 3: poor ol' Brad Arthur doesn't have rep quality players at his disposal.- storm were without there Queensland fullback, centre and five/eighth, not to mention playing with their third string halfback (probably the most important position. Despite all that they were still NRL standard.We have no excuses. We just plain suck.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • There can be no excuse for a 18 loss and 6 win year.
  • It's only the unicorns that are making excuses for themselves. They are a bunch of losers and whinging dork boys. They are a disgrace to this once great club. They need to stand up for themselves,  grow a pair of balls & stop accepting mediocrity.

    Stop whinging, moaning & groaning, get a life and make yourself accountable for your actions. The great Jack Gibson would have loved to give you lovely boys a nice slapping across the head.

    •  Chief: They have got it wrong for five years and will get it wrong for the next five years.

  • I’m still confident of a 5 year plan
    • When does the 5 years start?
  • Porn !  Suspension !  Khags is only 12 and this is a violation of his rights !

    • GEE-BLOODY-ZUZ Chief - if you call that porn no wonder you lot are satisfied with the Eels performances.

  • penrith fluke trys , steal game.
    • The harder you play the LUCKIER you get.

      Pennies made their own luck sonny and it was NO fluke they won.

    • I used to think that too but they do it far too often for it to be fluke or luck.
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Matterson - The gift that keeps on giving
"Gotta love this guy, ultimate bludger "
6 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to LB's discussion Barnett swap for Lomax
"I'd be interested to hear people's thoughts on signing a 31 year old prop coming off a full acl reconstruction in exchange for Lomax when the court case was only settled yesterday. Yeah great idea, we've just bought ourselves 2 years and blow it in…"
35 minutes ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst posted a discussion
3 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Safely, no. It would have only came off their cap if they signed Lomax."
4 hours ago
More…