You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"We don't need to do Melbourne's thinking for them, I'm sure they are more than capable. We just need to do what's best for us, and doing nothing isn't the worst option. Let them stew (Lomax in particular), there's nothing gained by being hasty in…"
"Don't be surprised if you see Coates in an eels jersey."
"Yes Coryn, but I want one of the top.3, Like someone said Warbrick is a huge risk, and we have enough second rowers. I think the only way we get one of the big 3 is if Lomax commits to the Storm long term. The issue is he's already broken two…"
If we dont get a swap for Lomax do we still have to pay him to sit in the side line for next 3 years
Replies
Reynolds just doesn't seem to be the player he once was..He walks around like a 80 year old man.
Really hope we don't get him.
No oo oo
we dont need him - Gutherson is going to develop into a very good 5/8. Why not persist with him?
I can't see Parra paying $800k for him though. I reckon he'll probably go to St George, although they would be throwing all their salary cap into the halves with Hunt on their list next year.
If we did sign him, is he a better proposition than Gutho (especially given the difference in age), and where would that leave Gutho?
yeah i know we arent even paying norman that yet
Why buy an expensive half at the end of his career when we have Corey and Guth signed longterm and have adaquate backups with Foggerty
Lol.
The Eels interested in Reynolds. Please. Ain't gonna happen.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 12 Next