You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"I've never agreed with the term "swap" being used in this saga. There is no swap. Lomax isn't an employee of ours. Not sure why the nrl want to involve themselves in this, or the players association for that matter. It's an agreement between us and…"
"Best example I can think of is if a player tears an acl then the club rips up his 4 year contract 🤣 unfortunate situations happen but you've signed the damn contract "
"It's just not the right way to do things is it. I have no idea what the final outcome of this will be, as I said before likely that Lomax pays some sort of compensation and it's done - not ideal from our perspective but that's life."
"Only difference here is that JAC was actually playing so NRL had no interest in getting him back into the game.
Not sure why they're so interested in this 1 guy who is most likely going to go to R360 if/when it actually starts."
Not sure why they're so interested in this 1 guy who is most likely going to go to R360 if/when it actually starts."
Replies
Reynolds just doesn't seem to be the player he once was..He walks around like a 80 year old man.
Really hope we don't get him.
No oo oo
we dont need him - Gutherson is going to develop into a very good 5/8. Why not persist with him?
I can't see Parra paying $800k for him though. I reckon he'll probably go to St George, although they would be throwing all their salary cap into the halves with Hunt on their list next year.
If we did sign him, is he a better proposition than Gutho (especially given the difference in age), and where would that leave Gutho?
yeah i know we arent even paying norman that yet
Why buy an expensive half at the end of his career when we have Corey and Guth signed longterm and have adaquate backups with Foggerty
Lol.
The Eels interested in Reynolds. Please. Ain't gonna happen.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 12 Next