You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Pou, I must have said this 20 times, I still do not understand why this is not understood. It just again states how options are misunderstood. (the fact that they are by the way, means they should never be used again).
e.g If Lomax asked for an…"
e.g If Lomax asked for an…"
"Without the player options he still would've been off contract. He still would've received the huge offer."
"Well they got us here and we still lost players we didn't need to lose essentially we as a club empowered these leech PAs and left us with what we have now.Thank god someone realised how destabilising they are and finally commons sense has…"
"If I'm honest I wouldn't touch any of them.
Id go and do what the warriors are doing a pillage the first 15 scene.
We aren't a player away so I'm all in on the development side and just load up there.
We are in a rebuild phase which is fine so the…"
Id go and do what the warriors are doing a pillage the first 15 scene.
We aren't a player away so I'm all in on the development side and just load up there.
We are in a rebuild phase which is fine so the…"
Replies
Reynolds just doesn't seem to be the player he once was..He walks around like a 80 year old man.
Really hope we don't get him.
No oo oo
we dont need him - Gutherson is going to develop into a very good 5/8. Why not persist with him?
I can't see Parra paying $800k for him though. I reckon he'll probably go to St George, although they would be throwing all their salary cap into the halves with Hunt on their list next year.
If we did sign him, is he a better proposition than Gutho (especially given the difference in age), and where would that leave Gutho?
yeah i know we arent even paying norman that yet
Why buy an expensive half at the end of his career when we have Corey and Guth signed longterm and have adaquate backups with Foggerty
Lol.
The Eels interested in Reynolds. Please. Ain't gonna happen.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 12 Next