Oz: 8th best Covid-19 response; why?

A Lowy Institite study ranked countries according to how they have managed coronavirus risks. NZ ranks 1st, Australia 8th. The Bottom 5 were: USA, Iran, Columbia, Mexico, Brazil. 
Note with all the debates about whether democracies or authoritarian regimes manage public risk better, or whether left or right of the political spectrum guards public health better, one fact stands out in the Lowy 100 List. The more a countries' politics is shaped by populist nationalism and strongman leadership, the worse it has done, regardless of whether the strongman is left or right politically. 
All the bottom 5 fit that description: US under (the far right) Trump, Iran under (fundamentalist, conservative Islam) Khamenei, Columbia under (right wing) Duque, Mexico under (leftist) Obrador, Brazil under (far right) Bolsonaro. The key element of populist strongman regimes is that they don't tolerate any devolution of power, and thus they attack other institutions: experts like health professionals, the media, courts, civic groups, etc, and they deligitimate any opposition as enemies of the state and insult then mercilessly. 
In Australia: ScoMo allowed a devolution of authority to States, who then effectively ran themselves as small population countries with strong border controls and close relations between political leadership and relevant institutions (like health care and medical experts). 
The lesson is? Beware the autocrats who are also populists and nationalists. It's the worst combination. 

SMH article: https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/analysis-ranks-the-countries-that-handled-covid-19-best-20210127-p56x3g.html

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I think Australia is rather unique in that the states hold a lot of power (left over from colonial times), and anyway they are the ones running the health system. ScoMo probably could have held onto some of that power in the guise of national interests, but he did the right thing and handed over to the states what they do best.

    We saw various degrees on populism (QLD, WA), which ended up with a hardline approach, but luckliy as you say they are not autocrats (that notion is just about impossible here). Interestingly, I do believe our political systems would not have allowed Trump to persist as long as he did. Ultimately the pressure would have been great to do away with him long before the election. The trouble with Trump was that he just didn't listen to his advisers, and that was his downfall, and the downfall of the US with how they reacted to Covid.

    • Longfin, yes, the Aussie political system is better equipped to deal with would-be autocrats like Trump. Our political parties are stronger than the weak US parties (they can't control delegates at primaries), the party that gets the most popular votes wins power (power is formed in the lower house), and we have no power invested in an individual (no independent Presidency). 

      I suspect what we will see once elections in Oz roll around, is that Premiers are more vulnerable than the PM. ScoMo could rightfully take credit for strong borders and Jobkeeper, and Premiers were stuck with any fallout from lockdowns. Palaszczuk in QLD rode the popularity in QLD of no community transmission but Andrew's in VIC is probably in for a rough ride. But we only have to look to the US to see what would have happened if federal (non)leadership hobbled States. 

      • This reply was deleted.
        • I can only think that New Zealand has a woman as a leader and again the superior comes forth.

          There is also no doubt that Gladys has done a wonderful job for New South Wales......what a shame that the Qld premier is actually a man!

          • everyone bagged her at the time but she didnt let anyone in or out until the shit was gone, where we get too comfortable and reopen too soon

            • Jacinda was right. Her critics wrong. She won. They lost. End of story!

              • Imagine only having to manage a country smaller than Sydney ...  people who can compare her task to that of an actual country with hundreds of millions is either very bias or a fool . 

                • You do realize the virus has the same reproduction rate whether it is in a country of hundreds of millions or tens of millions or just millions?

                  The only thing truly small in your comment is your small-mindedness. 

                  • If you can't see how having a eeenie meeenie tiny little small population in a large space would make it substantially easier to manage then it's not worth even having the discussion .  

                    as I said before ,  by your logic our reponse to major earthquakes leaves hers for dead . 

                    • Wiz, are you aware the population density of NZ is 18 people per square kilometer? The pop density of VIC is 28/sqkm, of NSW 10/sqkm. Of course population density is uneven. Melbourne's is 450/sqkm. Auckland's is 300/sqkm. Apparently there is a small zone in inner city Melbourne at 8,000/km. There is probably an area in Auckland like this too. 

                      Your point, in other words, is completely undone by the unevenness of population density but the need to manage a virus with a stable Ro across populations. You have to plan for the most vulnerable. Except if you're the US, or Brazil, or India, or the UK, and you just roll the dice without thinking about you're social network weak points.

                      Honestly, I understand you're point about few people in big areas. But it is fallacious to overlook uneven population density and what that means. The virus, as we have seen in Oz, often enters through your airports and seaports, which are often in zones of high population densities. The story of containment starts there, not out in the boonies as your imagery suggests. 

                    • Hahaha classic Wiz right there.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Darren Munro replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"Furthermore people on here wanted to pay sandon Smith 800k to a million. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣"
47 minutes ago
Darren Munro replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"LG doesn't seemed to be liked by the dogs.players. Gus has already putchased a half from Rooters.  Following along the Gus recruitment policy of throwing as much shit at a wall and hoping some will stick. Changes his mind more than a woman. The dogs…"
1 hour ago
Eli Stephens replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"Ethan Strange and Ezra mam are the best young 6s in the comp. Elite running game and eyes up footy. Galvin is a ways behind them but he's still solid "
2 hours ago
Who Cares replied to Bob mertens's discussion Shane Flanagan given a month to turn the dragons around.
"why is this on the eels site, who cares about Shane ( Grumpy ) Flanagan"
2 hours ago
Graham polkinghorne replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"Little hiccup for the Dogs. They all still want to win a GF. CC will figure how and when to inject LG into the team. They will be even stronger in 2026."
2 hours ago
Parra_Greg replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"Sexton and Mahoney have been good for them...Be interesting to see how Galvin and Haywood go next year.  If they falter this year in their run ....it may filter into 2026 and with they way they have binned players off will be added…"
2 hours ago
Parra_Greg replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
""Keep true to the dreams of your youth" nice one PT"
3 hours ago
Parra_Greg replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"lol true...maybe if he becomes 18th Man in Origin he will "
3 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"He'll be gone by the end of 2026, they'll realise hes not that guy. Hopefully we can try and snag katoa, put moses 6 and katoa 7. 
 "
3 hours ago
GM replied to Bob mertens's discussion Shane Flanagan given a month to turn the dragons around.
"🤣 dumbass "
4 hours ago
Frank The Tank replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"Na mate.
For $750k, they definitely expected him to be in their team, at least the top 17.
No way they bought him to put away like some mega rich business man does with his expensive watches. He's there to play in their halves. Even if that means…"
4 hours ago
Poppa replied to Eels2025's discussion Jason Ryles... Report so far
"I love a laugh Mickey and I appreciate Wiz's humour, just dont get the context.
PS .....Mickey you didn't see that coming?
Nostradamos your not Mickey and is it true your real name is "Glasscock".
 "
4 hours ago
Richard Jackson replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion Who ever is Parramatta lady defence coach is please help our NRL side please
"Yeah they stagger me how they keep turning up in defence.
They're a fit side and play as a team. Also a joy to watch."
5 hours ago
Sulkowicz replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"So did IM use MM as part of the plan. Heard MM tried to convince LG to come to the Eels."
6 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Canterbury hooker Reed Mahoney to join Cowboys on long-term deal
"His 20-22 seasons he was lights out for us.Ive seen him play alot better with a decent foward pack around him."
6 hours ago
Adam Magrath replied to Bob mertens's discussion Thank you GUSSY! The Galvin effect.
"Even if all that is true it is a good outcome that we didn't overextend ourselves. It's just as important to opt out on signing players who aren't a good fit for us. "
6 hours ago
More…

NSW Origin Squad 2025

WESTPAC NSW BLUES SQUADAmpol State of Origin, Game OneSuncorp Stadium, Brisbane Wednesday 28 May1. Dylan Edwards (Penrith Panthers)2. Brian To’o (Penrith Panthers)3. Stephen Crichton (Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs)4. Latrell Mitchell (South Sydney…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 261

 

Jake Averillo & Josh Kerr

As the title suggests, Jake Averillo & Josh Kerr are both rumoured to be free to negotiate with rivals clubs. I believe both players would fit well within Ryles' plan.Jake Averillo:There was some mail earlier this week that Ryles had met with Jake…

Read more…
86 Replies · Reply by Aracom 16 hours ago
Views: 3127

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>