Nathan Cleary

Just watched the Video (TickTok on nine,com.au) showing Nathan Cleary dancing with the uninvited female visitors. Having a great time. I think he NOW has more explaining to do!!! Any thoughts? Also just heard a report from Danny Weilder that Cleary wont be fined according to Penrith Police buit his uninvited guests might. Go figure.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I hope that Cleary has a bit of the gentleman left in him to pay the fines the girls may cope as a result of visiting him. $5K is nothing given his salary from Penrith. My guess is that at least some of the girls come from a single mum situation and would find it difficult to cough up $1000. The story changes by the day but it seems the girls should not have initiated the visit but equally, Cleary should not have let them into the house. Cleary has also told porkies about the whole matter. So paying their fines would be a decent thing to do.

  • Cleary should just claim he was providing an essential service

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Eelawarra's discussion THE EELS SUPERTEE
"This is how you build business relationships in the community with positive PR.  Sure attending hospitals, schools and attending charity days giving away free training gear and footies is great but this is something beyond that and means a lot to…"
1 minute ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"He is also doing what is best for his client and he is mates with Ryles too. A lot of backlash over the deal, he is coming in saying this was the plan all along with no thought of long term where i am saying there definately was an interest long…"
2 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Well why say yes to the question we wanted him long term?"
8 minutes ago
Tin Tim replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"It was explained at the time, but some here still had their own thoughts & like most of the time the people here were wrong. "
15 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Mate, im just asking you which one is correct?  Your the one that said the second version is incorrect as Anasta is  protecting the Eels 
Prove it LB"
16 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Others are putting more trust in the other version.  
When i posted this blog I didn't see both versions.   Im just saying both can't be correct,  and how would anyone prove which one is. 
So you're saying the second version is bs - prove it.
What…"
17 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Well it was, don't trigger the option. To trigger the option he would have known the deal before doing that. He wasn't doing a Zac Lomax."
30 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Oh they are definately not backing him. Coby Black signing means Sanders is not the long term answer as they are not moving Strange either. 
But what didn't work? Is that something we want to invest in?"
39 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Right, so if someone said they did something illegal, then a few months later said loud and clear they didn't do it that means they are innocent?
Sorry Chief makes no sense what you are saying. You say do not jump to conclusions if we don't know the…"
41 minutes ago
HKF replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Staying in Melbourne next season was not an option after he elected to take up the option of getting out of his contract. "
45 minutes ago
MeelK replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Chief, I think you mean you'd put more trust in the version that suits your narrative... "
48 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Oh yeah it could have started with us reaching out wanting long term, Pezet saying he wanted to play 7, Brisbane coming in and wanting him but not til 2027. He either stayed at Melbourne for 2026 or played FG at Parramatta in 2026 and we felt there…"
50 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Fair enough, Adam. Also, I agree with you that Walker has the footy IQ to be a stop-gap. Not sure it'll come to that though. Still, I suspect Ryles likes high-IQ halves; even at six.
One theme in his era has been raising the average IQ across the…"
54 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"I don't think they're preferencing either right now. Renzo got an opportunity in NSW Cup last season and given our focus on finding a long-term 5/8 I think he's probably further ahead development-wise. Renzo has been extended to the end of 2028 and…"
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"And Anasta said it loud and clear in yesterday's podcast aswell.   
No.use jumping to conclusions if we don't know the real answer.  
This blog is concerning the Kayo podcast.  Where he wasn't promoted by his mates, and he wasn't drunk on his Bali…"
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"LB, good post mate. The thing is: Reality trumps whatever we agree or disagree with. Roosters signed DCE for a year. Panthers signed Lussick for a year. We signed Pezet for a year.
So, we're making mountains out of ant mounds on here about it…"
1 hour ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>