Nathan Cleary Escapades

Here we go again. Nathan Cleary allegedly not being truthful about his lady visitors on Anzac Day. Tic Tok video dancing etc. He won’t be fined by Penrith Police however his lady guests may be fined for visiting in breach of Covid-19. All over 9 news.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Another high profile player.what do you expect 

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Since the government said you can't join with family inside a residence that do not live together.

    • This reply was deleted.
      • This reply was deleted.
        • This reply was deleted.
          • bat soup ?

             

          • Lol soup and tits. Now that deserves a blog of its own.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Flow Basket replied to Clintorian's discussion Is Toby Rudolph worth chasing?
"He's clean "
15 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Hell On Eels's discussion David and Goliath: Lomax and the Shadow Wars
"Have actually seen the Storm have turned their attention to stealing young cooper bai from the titans. Bellamy has secretly met with him. Can they not promote their own juniors ? 🤣"
19 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Hell On Eels's discussion David and Goliath: Lomax and the Shadow Wars
"Wouldn't it be glorious to screw over V'landys and the Storm in one single power move after the NRL essentially stabbed us in the back. I don't have much confident, but I do have hope.
 "
1 hour ago
Clintorian replied to Johnny Suede's discussion The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
"Ah, forgot about Matto. I agree, this is his last chence to land another contract, I think he'll have a great year."
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion David and Goliath: Lomax and the Shadow Wars
"Great Read Hoe! Three or Four things stand out for me that directed the Eels to the Supreme Court.
1. Lomax notified the Eels that he wasn't recognising the terms of agreement and that they were unenforceable.
2. And everyone is missing this step.…"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
"you mispelled fanciful"
1 hour ago
EA replied to Clintorian's discussion Is Toby Rudolph worth chasing?
"pass. Would not move the needle at all."
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion David and Goliath: Lomax and the Shadow Wars
"O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!
Nice, Hoe (insert loud hsndclap) just really good stuff 
We are in this up to our eyeball and will need some help...Will allies appear? I think so.
A contest over who really sets the rules when agreements become…"
1 hour ago
Smiffy replied to Johnny Suede's discussion The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
"This will be unpopular, but Matterson could be that forward if he buys into Ryles gameplan and applies himself."
1 hour ago
Muttman replied to Hell On Eels's discussion David and Goliath: Lomax and the Shadow Wars
"Great blog HOE.However, I understand why the Eels chose to initiate legal action first. Once Lomax formally advised in writing that he did not intend to comply with the terms of his release, the club had little choice but to act. It was far better…"
2 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Hell On Eels's discussion David and Goliath: Lomax and the Shadow Wars
"Great article HOE, one of your best.
I agree, win or lose this feels like a bigger turning point that the Eels are no longer comfortable being pushovers and a line in the sand hasfinally been drawn. Personally, I'm glad we're going head-to-head with…"
2 hours ago
Seth hardy replied to Hell On Eels's discussion David and Goliath: Lomax and the Shadow Wars
"A good accurate blog on the situation. Almost a dissertation. Sadly, the corruption that exists in all forms of power today leads me to believe we will still get shafted. It's not about Parra, it's about control."
2 hours ago
Bourbon Man replied to Hell On Eels's discussion David and Goliath: Lomax and the Shadow Wars
"This is a great read HOE. It certainly has been a bug bear of mine for some time that the Club never stands up to the NRL - the most obvious example being the Israel Folau drama you mentioned.
When Uncle Nick makes a demand, he gets his way - and…"
2 hours ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"In a courtroom, the principle of "Good Faith" is strictly adhered to. Especially when one side is seen to do the right thing. "
2 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Johnny Suede's discussion The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
"I fee like we need one maniac in the pack... it could be Moretti, but we do need someone with some real aggression that can lay a platform for the other athletic forwards."
3 hours ago
Alfred Mateo replied to Johnny Suede's discussion The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
"Can't argue with that. Hopgood might be in the mix for origin selection but no real mongrels/tough hombres in our current pack.
Interesting to see how Newcastle goes this year. On paper, their backline is probably ranked in the top 5 but some doubt…"
3 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1973

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 270

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>