Nathan Cleary

Just watched the Video (TickTok on nine,com.au) showing Nathan Cleary dancing with the uninvited female visitors. Having a great time. I think he NOW has more explaining to do!!! Any thoughts? Also just heard a report from Danny Weilder that Cleary wont be fined according to Penrith Police buit his uninvited guests might. Go figure.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I hope that Cleary has a bit of the gentleman left in him to pay the fines the girls may cope as a result of visiting him. $5K is nothing given his salary from Penrith. My guess is that at least some of the girls come from a single mum situation and would find it difficult to cough up $1000. The story changes by the day but it seems the girls should not have initiated the visit but equally, Cleary should not have let them into the house. Cleary has also told porkies about the whole matter. So paying their fines would be a decent thing to do.

  • Cleary should just claim he was providing an essential service

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Pato replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Don't miss out on the headlines from NRL. Followed categories will ...

follow




Zac Lomax may be forced to wait even longer to find out whether he is given the green light to return to the NRL with Melbourne after the Supreme Court delayed his…"
2 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Eels interested in Barnett
"You really think Barnett would accept a CO? I mean he has plenty of suitors and is an Origin forward, he wont accept a CO from us."
15 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Eels interested in Barnett
"He will be 33 next year, that is my thinking. We are looking for a Paulo replacement yet are looking at someone who is a year younger? No denying his talent, he is an incredible player and if we don't have de Belin next year then yeah he would be…"
17 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Eels interested in Barnett
"He would be 33 next year. But yeah."
22 minutes ago
Tin Tim replied to LB's discussion Eels interested in Barnett
"He an asset, our young forwards are playing out of their skin because of De-Bellin & Paulo they are teaching them the way. It needs to continue with an experienced prop that will teach them how to be professional & mentally strong. No better than…"
1 hour ago
Kramerica replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Parramatta, NRL to investigate images of rising Eels star
"xxoo :)"
4 hours ago
Jack replied to LB's discussion Eels interested in Barnett
"Pass "
5 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to LB's discussion Eels interested in Barnett
"You say 32yo isn't ancient but he would turn 34 only 1 month into his first season if we sign him for 2027. Also plenty here said Koloamatangi wasn't worth a 5 year risk despite a 5yr contract seeing him through to age of 33 or 34.
With the young…"
6 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to LB's discussion Eels interested in Barnett
"He was granted a release for his child illness so Newcastle would be favourites as that is where his family is closest.  But  they spent all their cap on Dylan Brown and Ponga..  Not sure the issue with Barnetts child but one would think Westmead…"
6 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Moses SC asks the court: "Did Tripp make it up? Or who's telling the truth (Tripp or HQ)?"
Tripp, the Storm boss, made an implied threat towards the Eels saying the NRL could punish the Eels if it held firm on Lomax by issuing a salary cap sanction,…"
6 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Will V'landy's will be asked to testify? He's already had his bird return once due to air-con challenges. Abdo? They could confirm it's all a misunderstanding, and they never had any intentions of doing what Storm said they were going to do."
7 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"They should be shitting themselves, they thought they could just walk all over us and we wouldn't do anything about it, dodgy cunts."
7 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Iongi: Recent Illicit Substance Scandals vs NRL Sanctions
"Got any priors for players done for weed. I don't recall any.
Unlike weed, everything on that list is a class A. drug.
 "
8 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Thanks Pato. It's 4o4. Does it say Tripp has not been asked to appear on the first? They can't make him but they can tear him up without reply if he doesn't attend
 "
8 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Yeah Super, that's what I thought.
Pato was saying "unavailable to appear until 13th March. So Lomax won't be playing for Storm until Rd3 at the earliest if they get a result in their favour."
I thought he was saying it had been moved to 13th
 "
8 hours ago
ParraPride replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Iongi: Recent Illicit Substance Scandals vs NRL Sanctions
"He'll be fine it seems like an old picture."
8 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2113

 

Eels interested in Barnett

Parramatta are interested in Mitch Barnett. Now at 33 in 2027 and coming off ACL, good idea? Having Paulo and De Belin being 34 and 36 respectively is it good to have that much age? Ryles wants a Paulo replacement that can lead the forwards, Barnett…

Read more…
22 Replies · Reply by LB 15 minutes ago
Views: 815

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>