All of these pictures are in public record thus are not breaking any forum rules of posting fellow 1EE pictures.

Please post mugshots of fellow 1EE posters.

 

Chucky

8623782495?profile=RESIZE_710x

Prof Daz
8623790662?profile=RESIZE_400x

Super

8623852466?profile=RESIZE_710x

Carls8623814270?profile=RESIZE_400x

 

Col

8623818880?profile=RESIZE_400x

 

 

Poppa8623832078?profile=RESIZE_400x

Fongy
8623823694?profile=RESIZE_400x

 

 

EE8623832466?profile=RESIZE_584x

 

 

60s
8623833287?profile=RESIZE_400x

 

BRISSYEEL

8623840488?profile=RESIZE_710x

 

Bazza8623845101?profile=RESIZE_400x

 

Kram

8623851652?profile=RESIZE_584x

 

Monts8623857652?profile=RESIZE_710x

Please add.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Joel K replied to Johnny Suede's discussion The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
"Pretty fair ranking regarding the Eels, although we have more depth then other clubs which isn't included in the rating
Putting Roosters at first is laughable, Broncos have the best pack in the comp "
8 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Johnny Suede's discussion The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
"We have more depth than most other clubs. The fact that they didn't even mention Moretti,  Guymer or Doorey shows our advantage "
13 minutes ago
Perpetual Motion replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"I think its the case. Parra had to take it court as Lomax notified them he intended to ignore the conditions of his contract and sign with Melbourne."
1 hour ago
Bob Smith replied to Johnny Suede's discussion The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
"The 'experts' always big note the Roosters. Expect them to fight hard for bottom half of the 8."
1 hour ago
Johnny Suede replied to Johnny Suede's discussion The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
"The full 17
1. Roosters
2. Storm
3. Broncos
4. Dolphins
5. NZ
6. Sharks
7. Riff
8. Canberra
9. Parra
10. Tigers
11. Manly
12. Dogs
13. Rabbits
14. Cowboys
15. Dragons
16. Titans
17. Knights"
1 hour ago
The Captain replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"In Lomaxs mins he has little to lose and a lot to gain by trying his luck.
R360 didn't happen, rugby has offered him a fraction of what he was on in the NRL. The dude is shellshocked by how quickly his life has gone from on top of the world to…"
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"He's done but if some team dumb enough is out there think they can get something out of him good luck.I'd hold the door open for him to leave if we got something in return red carpet roll the club would have fleeced whomever made this deal."
2 hours ago
LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"If it involves a chance to get more money could be surprised."
3 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"I have seen no evidence that Matto CAN still perform, for any reason...it's in the past"
3 hours ago
LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Though Hannay might like the experience of Matto. Move Tino to Prop and Matto at Lock. Plus Matto is off-contract, bloke will perform to get one more deal."
3 hours ago
LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"As is always the case. Human nature. There is a chance that Melbourne just drop off."
3 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Poppa's discussion Shark Attack..... Moses told to be wary of the surf!
""
3 hours ago
Parraborn1 replied to Johnny Suede's discussion What player each NRL club would need to cough-up to snare Lomax
"I'd argue that nobody wants Lomax except for Melbourne who are desperate for short-term acquisitions. "
4 hours ago
iamnot replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"that's on Lomax, his agent and his legal team, not Parramatta. If R360 made promises to him they couldn't fulfil, its on Lomax to take R360 to court. "
4 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"If you lost Joliffe would you replace him with Matto?....it's like replacing your car with a banana"
4 hours ago
iamnot replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"R360 didn't exist at all when Lomax requested, and obtained, the release. It still doesn't. Lomax never had a contract there, as neither did any other player, including RTS. So, Lomax doesn't have an argument that his circumstances have changed. And…"
4 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1973

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 270

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>