Was 4 matched for Montoya who called Kyle Feldt a "f****t" too much? was it too little? or was it just about right, opinion is divided as it is such a touchy topic thought do we believe what he received was good enough or not?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I didn't see the game, did Feldt make a complaint?

    • Apparently after the game he did not sure 100% sure on that though, got heard on the refs mic.

      • If he made a complaint fair enough, but I hate that the refs are mic'd up for all to hear. These sort of things should be dealt with internally without public knowledge. Has he been given the opportunity to apologize for something said in the heat of the moment? 4 matches is a pretty stiff penalty in my view.  

  • LB, obviously a sensitive subject, so will tread carefully, but:

    Montoya - 4 weeks - For verbally abusing an opposition player in the heat of battle, granted he did use a very poor choice of word.

    NAS - 0 weeks, 0 penalty - For trying to seriously injure a player while their head was turned.

    Campbell - 0 weeks, 0 - penalty - For breaking & puncturing Russell's lungs.

    Junior - 1 week, sin bin & penalty - For smashing someone in the shoulder so hard, their head whiplashed into it afterwards but they did not require an HIA from an independant Doctor.

    Which of these incidents had the least impact on the game, the players team, physical well being, or ability to play the game in future weeks?

    They should ask Russell & Maka which they'd have preferred to be on the end of.

    If Montaya had a history of doing this, if he went out of his way to attack gay players, then some education there is definitely needed. But is that the case, or was this just a mistake (a stupid one nontheless)? He's apologised and looks as though he genuinely was sorry for it.

    I just cant respect anything the NRL / MRC do at the moment, they've 100% lost it, and desperate attempts to be seen 'doing the right thing' to the public is just further embarrassment after what they've missed lately.

    • Sorry but I can't let go of the Junior tackle, they replayed it a bunch of times on 360 last night whist discussing it and couldn't reach a unanimous verdict amongst the panel. They were saying that during a game a players head is contacted numerous times throughout a match which goes without punishment - the issue arises with the MRC when the contact is "forceful".

      Having watched it numerous times there is an argument that it was Brimson's head that made forceful contact with Junior's shoulder given the initial point of contact was shoulder to shoulder, the speed that Brimson was moving at and that Junior was more or less stationary when the tackle was made. As everyone has said - whiplash. I guess I have to leave it and move on but it's got me beat why we didn't dispute this one. 

      • Understand where you are coming from Adam, and when it comes down to purely the incident itself - 100% agree.

        I can understand not fighting it purely because in todays game, they see anything relating to contact with the head as black & white with no extenuating circumstances. I don't think we would've won, especially with the MRC trying to back the decision of a sin bin despite the independant Doctor seeing no need for an HIA.

        But if you feel we would've won, 100% respect your opinion on it. This is also the issue (as others have raised) with this ridiculous system of you can accept less of a punishment by pleading guilty. Players should not be tempted to accept something they dont agree with purely because it could cost them another week if they fight it. What a cop out that is from the NRL / MRC.

         

  • IMO , if by saying the word " f.gg.t " he did so intending the player be potentially demeaned for his sexuality then , yes , Montoya deserved the 4 weeks penalty at a minimum . Though I guess he would never admit that was his thinking though .   Otherwise , if that word was chosen in haste and not meant to be a reflection of Montoya 's opinon about Feldt's sexuality then the penalty seems very harsh , a public apology should suffice surely . Crikies footy guys are grown men , so whatever happened to the saying " sticks and stones ......". . ??? 

    • See i've been around footy fields a lot in terms of park footy, you hear that word and others alot and i would say 99/100 times that say that word simply to say they are weak or as a term to disgruntle the other player, not to knock their sexuality.

      If a player is gay then you say it then fair game for that player to receive punishment, same if you use a racist term to a player of a different race.

  • Well that's light considering I was banned for almost 4 months for using the four lettered version.

    As for calling someone that on the field, big fucking deal, Jesus soon they'll ban talking as anyone can be offended by anything if they so choose. 

    Everyone has a right to be or to not be offended but where do we draw the line on common sense? I don't think Montoya really gives a shit either way it's just a sledge FFS.

    Is Feldt even gay? And if he is why would he be worried by that sledge?

    End of the day this shit stops if people stop giving it air time. Move on....

    • The NRL is full of shit. Montoya should have got a 1 week ban and a five grand fine.

      Bryan Fletcher called Dean Widders a Black C and all he got was a five grand fine and lost his captaincy at the bunnies. The bunnies, a club with a huge Aboriginal fan base! This was worthy of a 4 week ban, if any.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 6 moreeee
"Issue is it will be here to stay. Same with that stupid kick-off rule that all bar Bennett were against. V'Landys will force it in if the coaches like it or not and ruin it more. They are trialing the kick-off rule at the end of the year on games…"
2 minutes ago
LB replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Hopgood 2 week ban,
"Yep, you could see in the 2nd half we went back to the old sideline to sideline attack. Instead playing through them."
7 minutes ago
shane replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 6 moreeee
"It has always been a blight on this great game, it was never for slowing down the ruck it has always been for the 1's in charge manipulating the game. At the beginning they always showed why the six again was given than all of a sudden it stopped…"
13 minutes ago
LB replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 6 moreeee
"The thing I have found interesting was when I did some digging on Kearney. It was brought up how Ryles is now Kearney, I came to see in 42 games as coach we only conceded 50 once under him. 
in 25 games with Ryles 3 times. But also 6 again rule has…"
19 minutes ago
Longfin Eel replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 6 moreeee
"Even the tackles are a grey area. Some tackles have players holding the tackled player down so their defensive line can get set and it doesn't get penalised. Other tackles the same thing does. Where is the consistency that viewers demand? The NRL…"
28 minutes ago
LB replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 6 moreeee
"Though Coryn I would argue the sport, like any, is always entertainment. You go to watch a park footy match, you are watching it for entertainment, it wasn't entertaining you wouldn't watch it.
We watch tennis as it's entertaining. Cricket the same.…"
34 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 6 moreeee
"Yes basically holding the ball and making minimal mistakes is the way to victory. "
38 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 6 moreeee
"Looking like fitness will be extremely important now and holding possession.  I think if we're taking advantage of the new rules and winning,  nobody would be worrying about rules 
If Parramatta are on top, who cares
Melbourne seemed to nail…"
44 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Hopgood 2 week ban,
"Try taking that to the nrl and see how it works NoS.
The difference between this and the court case we had the rule of law on our side not a public perception hear in lies the difference.
I mentioned this last year when we went to Melbourne you have…"
54 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 6 moreeee
"Oh we played terrible but I'll know we'll be better moving forward. This is more about the nrl as a whole. Soon they will be wearing tags and it'll be tag footy. 🤣 you can't really win the ruck or dominate that way anymore you have to tackle then…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 6 moreeee
"Welcome to the world of entertainment this is exactly what's happend in the nfl also they've taken the physicality and down graded it with rule changes and alike.The next thing your probably going to see with head knocks coming more prevalent is…"
1 hour ago
Longfin Eel replied to Davos Seaworth's discussion Stephen Kearney vibes from Gomer Ryles.
"To be fair, we've had one game with a new halves pairing, plus a few other new players thrown in. It's frustrating at the moment, but we are actually in a much better position in terms of depth than we have been for years. We won't see instant…"
1 hour ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 6 moreeee
"Not saying we didn't play bad, but if you watch most games you can see how it influences momentum and flow of a game. With little to no explanation. Of course a team is going to get blown off the park if they have to tackle 3 sets straight for a…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Davos Seaworth's discussion Stephen Kearney vibes from Gomer Ryles.
"Oh dear I fear not they aren't in the same ball park this comparison."
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 6 moreeee
"If we'd won on Thursday nobody would be complaining. 
The worst game handling wise I've ever seen from an nrl team. A disgraceful display that Ryles needs to address.
A smaller pack like ours should take advantage of the 6 again rules as there's…"
1 hour ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 6 moreeee
"100% has taken all the grit out of the game. It's just touch footy now and fastest to play the ball wins "
1 hour ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2166

 

1eE Modern day Eels team: Second-row

PJ Marsh has come out of nowhere to secure the starting Hooking role for this side. With a 3 way tie for 2nd between Drew, Mahoney and Riddell.Now onto the back-row, one of them is a for gone conclusion so i am better off just putting him in now,…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 97

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>