Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide

PREAMBLE: Ladies and Gentleman, Super is happy for this discussion to continue if we can remain civil and disagree respectfully, updated as necessary. If not, comments will be removed and if necessary the blog closed and any future Kirk-related blogs closed for discussion. 

Part 1, by Wiz (more right leaning)

Part 2, by Prof Daz (more left leaning)

SYNOPSIS: Charlie Kirk spoke his final words at 12:23 p.m. on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University, in front of around three thousand people. Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old alleged shooter of the 31-year-old Republican, remains under investigation. Utah’s governor suggested he may have been radicalized by the Left, though his MAGA-entrenched family and transgender partner complicate the narrative.

The attack shook the United States, exposing deep ideological fractures. Two days later, President Donald Trump concluded that “the radicals on the left are the problem” rather than the radical right who, he said, merely want to “stop crime,” framing the debate in partisan terms during a live Fox News interview. However, voices such as Jack Posobiec and Steve Bannon, speakers at Kirk’s conventions, had long used hard-line rhetoric, calling the Left “demonic” and urging the building of “an army of the awakened.”

History offers a far broader perspective. Abraham Lincoln, Yitzhak Rabin, Mahatma Gandhi, and Martin Luther King Jr. were assassinated by right-wing extremists. John F. Kennedy and Archduke Franz Ferdinand, whose death helped ignite World War I, were killed by left-leaning radicals. A two-way street.

Just months earlier, on June 14, Democrats Melissa and Mark Hortman were gunned down in their Brooklyn home by Vance Boelter, a hard-right evangelical, white Christian who disguised himself as a police officer. Married nearly 32 years, the couple left behind two children. The killings, however, received far less attention than Kirk’s death and did not prompt a presidential call to confront the radical right.

“What do they all share in common? Every political assassination is an attack on the collective; on our ability to disagree without destroying,” an academic observer noted. George Bernard Shaw called it the "extreme form of censorship."

Left or Right isn't the problem in my view. The greater danger lies in the radical mind and in how easily society nurtures the “us versus them” divide. As Desmond Tutu warned, “The moment we divide the world into ‘us’ and ‘them,’ we begin to lose our humanity.”

13712347853?profile=RESIZE_710xCharlie Kirk (above and below) is survived by his wife and two children.

13712347677?profile=RESIZE_710x

13712348254?profile=RESIZE_710x

Married nearly 32 years, Melissa and Mark Hortman as well as Gilbert, their Labrador (below) leave behind two children.

13712347889?profile=RESIZE_710x

13712348297?profile=RESIZE_710x

Boelter who assasinated the Hartmans allegedly kept a hit list of 70 targets, including Democratic lawmakers and even some anti-abortion clinics. The same early morning at 2am he invaded the Minnesota home (above) of the Hoffmans and their children who survived the shooting following surgery.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • The bigger issue over left and right is MH.  The far right and far left likely have MH issues, whether it is insecurities, anxiety, feeling they are alone and seeking acceptance into any group that will have them.  Extremists prey on these people seeking to belong to something.

    There are idiots and loonies everywhere but as Charlie Kirk once asked a nurse, if an anorexic patient turned up to medical practice, would the Dr agree they are fat and tell them they should starve themselves or continue throwing up all their food.  No they would be treated and the issue identified.

    Body dismorphia is real but the same as others with other MH issues shouldn't it be discussed and treated before undergoing life changing alternatives.  I have a cousin who cried during puberty.  She wanted to be boy so badly, and was what was considered a tomboy.

    Now grown up with kids of her own she looks at gender reaffirming care and thinks what may have happened to her if she was a child now and it makes her fear the pressure kids are under.  Even the cool seemingly confident kids have sense of not belonging or body images as kid.  It is normal but being a femine man or a masculine girl is fine. 

    It is clear through demographics of famous people in Hollywood and in elite suburbs where being left isn't just cool but worshipped, that LGBT and trans kids are at an unnaturally high ratio.  Why is that, if it is natural then rates would be consistent across the board, or are the parents and society influencing these innocent kids to for attention and belonging.

  •  

    HKF September 11, 2025 at 10:14am 

    The violent far left strike again, no doubt they will try to claim the killer was a right wing nut trying to escalate the dislike of the left.

    Since receipts are the in thing i thought i might leave one of my own from the original Charlie kirk blog.

  •  I wish i knew
    which button to push
    So i'd know how to please you
    It's sad but true
    but i keep lookin'
    on down the line
    All i see is chaos and pain
    Scared and hiding
    in the blaze
    our fucking lives are not your game
    You try to play us just the same
    Just wish i knew
    which button to push

                       apologies B,Fanning

  • I mean no offence to anyone here, purely my own opinion, neither ‘Left' or ‘Right’ aligned, as I personally believe these two spectrums of political & ideological beliefs are purely a mythology, a tool or weapon, for division, for distraction, control. 

    At it’s core, the idea of choosing a definitive side - ‘Left' or ‘Right’ - is extreme in nature. This ideological absolution feeds and nurtures extremism, extreme beliefs, violence and extreme results.
     
    It’s tribalism. A definitive loyalty to either tribe that clouds or destroys the ability for constructive debate, for understanding, for open-mindedness, for empathy.
     
    Debate, negotiation, understanding, its constructive, its empowering. Watching a young father's death celebrated for his views, or young parents murdered for theirs, regardless of your tribe, is a reflection of how disassociated we have become.
     
    These two-sided political factions developed during the French Revolution, a dictatorship, where regardless of your beliefs & ideologies, you were forced to pick a side, your life, your salvation depended on it.
     
    Fear, threats, violence, death, not exactly the best strategy for liberation? Here we are, 220+ years later, and the same irrationalle remains. 
     
    Truth, justice, equilibrium, don’t exist in an imbalance, they can’t be separated into two political divisions. They can’t exist in the ‘us verse them' mentality. 
     
    At the heart of these ideological factions lies division, division is a powerful means of control - its far easier to control masses divided, than united.
     
    Division weakens us, it distracts us. Our political leaders and governing bodies are the ones consistently fuelling these fires.
     
    Because politicians and media alike thrive on polarities, the conflict sells, the fear mongering motivates, and chaos of fighting divisions distracts us from far deeper & more pertinent questions of those empowered. 
     
    Humans are complex, we evolve, we grow, develop, we are shaped by experience, turmoil or trauma, by education, faith, pain & happiness.
     
    It ts embarrassing to the human race to assume we are so un-evolved, that our ideological stances & beliefs should remain confined into one loyal tribe, as though we all stand at a t-intersection & must decide a direction, in absolution.
     
    It is irrational, and void of critical thinking.
     
    Politics, ideologies, beliefs, are far too complex to be confined into just two thought processes, they are multifaceted, as we should be?
     
    We truely are being challenged right now, there is so much frustration, anger, suffering, and resentment grows towards those who we feel are causing the problems.
     
    If it wasn’t for the ‘Left’, or if it wasn’t for the ‘Right’, everything would be great.
     
    Would it though?
     
    Completely eliminate one side of the debate, and whichever remained would more likely start turning on themselves than live in harmony.
     
    All of a sudden, some just aren’t ‘Left’ or ‘Right’ enough, that group is too ‘Centre-Left’ or that faction is too ‘Extreme Right' and history would continue to repeat itself. Tribalism repeats. 
     
    Who knows where this ends, but signs are troubling. Parts of Europe are fracturing under ideological tension, and the US seems perennially on the brink of civil unrest. Online discourse has become hositle, and people are dying, not for their actions, but for their beliefs and words, and thier deaths celebrated - hisotry repeats. 
     
    When a young father or young parents are murdered, for nothing more than their words, their beliefs, how can we not feel sadness for how irrational this has all become.
     
    No offence intended, purely opinion.
    • Great post NOS.

    • I used to think like this NOS, but it really feels like i need to choose a side in this. So i did. I chose the Broad Church, not the Christofascists(they hate being called that, but the only reason to attack abortion is.). Fuck their Purity tests. I mean, they see Prof Daz as a huge threat and dangerously hateful. I'm not having it. I chose a side

      and people are dying, not for their actions, but for their beliefs and words.. his words actively encouraged the actions of others and his beliefs were christofascist. 

      We are not going to unite around blatant lies and "othering people". Buckle Up

       

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Richard Jackson replied to Clintorian's discussion Depth looking good with Volkman and Twiddle on Fire in NSW Cup Finals
"Yeah it was brilliant to see Twidle and Volk stand-out again Clintorian.
And i was amazed we held on to the ball for almost all the game.
Twidle putting his winger over twice early settled us down and allowed us tp play footy instead of catch-up.
I…"
3 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"It only takes one clip that resonates and you're instantly swinging
How fucking flakey do you think I am Wiz?"
7 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Agreed Meelk, the things our Flag represents(democracy, egalitarianism and cold beer) are what have me looking at Trump and the USRight and thinking about the fact that I may have to actively defend those things here. "
11 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Wiz, I am not currently fighting for LaLa's rights. It's all talk right now. But if the Right follows through on it's constant "vermin" rhetoric and starts coming for her, well, i will then be coming for them. And i will not be alone"
22 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Bobbo, you do not understand violence at all. You're black rectangle just gives you a hard-on for it"
30 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"I used to think like this NOS, but it really feels like i need to choose a side in this. So i did. I chose the Broad Church, not the Christofascists(they hate being called that, but the only reason to attack abortion is.). Fuck their Purity tests. I…"
37 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"To reply to your "questions": Framing the deep issues in terms of Victim-Blame-Games is next to useless, a projection & divisive. Worst still is your fanatical solution: a Civil War & carting masses to "work camps". Yep, as long as the president…"
51 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Hoe, I re-read first thread and  I was close to a celebrating vibe in it. I did not celebrate, but i went close.I despised him. I did not debase myself by pretending to be upset that he, rather than anyone else, was dead. He was a divisive talking…"
1 hour ago
MeelK replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"In many ways I agree Randy. I have absolutely no problem with our current flag, and would support it till the day I die. Conversely, if our great democracy decided it was time for something new, I'd be fine with that too. I'm more about what the…"
1 hour ago
MeelK replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Yeah it's a good point HOE, I guess circumstances would or should dictate how others, inlcuding us, should respond."
1 hour ago
MeelK replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Great post NOS."
1 hour ago
adnan replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Hoops was fried 😂😂😂
"your not the only one
 "
1 hour ago
Wizardssleeves official receipts replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Tell me which rights you're talking about that have been removed or floated to be removed and we can discuss . 
Os there a particular right that worries you that's on the table to be scrapped for trans or gays ?  
These are the topics that awareness…"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"What rule/law/thing would you make/change to bring about your  Christofascist Utopia, BobtheGronk???
One at at time now, this ain't your mums boudoir
 "
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it. I have too much emotion attached to this one. Family phots at events, Anzac Day, ADF, Olympics etc. Please wait till i am past.
I hate flags on shirts and merch.
A good poles are where it's at, but in frontyards it…"
1 hour ago
Bob Smith replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"You haven't answered the questions I asked, so why should I answer yours? I'm not getting dragged into a long, drawn out 'debate', when I'm to be the only one answering questions. "
2 hours ago
More…

 

We Could Of Won This Year

If only we didn't lose Moses at the beginning of the year we could of won this comp this year. The form we were in. The quality of the finals from all teams this weekend has been the most average I can remember. Please anyone but the Broncos win it.…

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Mark yesterday
Views: 807

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>