Impersonator and help!

  • Hi guys, it's come to my attention that someone else has been posting as magpie with an eels logo as there picture. THIS IS NOT ME! Not sure how to contact site admin but if you read this please tell me how to sort this out. Cheers.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I was questioning myself if this was the case, the writing style  is completely different to what it was. 

  • I've messaged the other member and asked him to change his username.

    • Awesome thanks.

    • While you're at it super, could you message the other Joseph? Thanks Joseph

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Yer, apparently you can register a user name that someone else also has. Which can potentially lead to all kinds of chaos I'd suggest.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • This reply was deleted.
          • Thanks popsicle. I don't mind copping a lash if people disagree with my views, but not if there represented as my views by someone else.

  • Ok it was you not me or was it someone else trying to be the both of us hmmmmmm such a conundrum 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Lol Lomax cried to the NRL, Melbourne did also. Never been told no in a long time. Gallop did once and got abused by many in the game for doing the right thing. "
1 minute ago
LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"I doubt it as outside the NRL would include SL even. Union, AFL, UFC, Boxing, Golf even. If R360 didn't eventuate there is an ample amount of opportunities still there."
3 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"In all essence this case is very black n white but Lomax's lawyers will be looking for avenues that will highlight different that's the key here is for us not to get drawn into the Lomax arguement but to stay on track and highlight what's been…"
3 hours ago
Clintorian replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Not to mention all the other teams in Rugby he could be playing in."
7 hours ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
9 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
10 hours ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
11 hours ago
RB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Yeah, but does that count if the opportunity never eventuated, is what I think they'll argue"
11 hours ago
RB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Yep, but fuck I hope not. The Nrl should be on parras side here"
11 hours ago
The Badger replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Our side says it's black & white. His side says it's more grey."
12 hours ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"I think the wording was 'opportunities outside of the NRL'. That's what Sarantinos said in the press release. "
12 hours ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"For sure it is. He has other options but only wants Melbourne. I think there's a whisper that the Storm have been behind this from the beginning. If that comes to light this could be huge. "
12 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Yeah, there must be something like that. The wording of the contract centred around Parra thinking he was definitely playing R360. The contract could be void. "
12 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Never thought of such foul play. But it is cheating Melbourne, so I wouldn't put it past them. "
12 hours ago
fishbulb replied to Poppa's discussion Shark Attack..... Moses told to be wary of the surf!
"That"s because i'm Abnormal. Fight right in here."
12 hours ago
BringBackSemi replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"One would suspect that when he originally signed with Parra, it was before he had that breakout season at the Dragons, which resulting in him playing rep footy. His contract was on less money than at the Dragons, and he probably believed he was…"
12 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1973

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 269

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>