How did this site become a political mess?

I hardly comment anymore on posts. If I do, I try keep my opinions to myself. Not worth it. 

The way people get treated here sometimes is straight up appalling. Comments are made to cut deep. The pack mentality runs wild.

I come here because I'm an Eels fan. Turns out some people are here because they're fans of themselves. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I think HOE and Super explained well, why McLovin was banned. There's no need to start another blog about it calling out the mods for their pack mentality. 

    • LOL!!!!

  • I agree, most on here are intent on delivering a serve back,  working on their biggest insult or trying to prove someone wrong rather than talking about the footy.

    Some commenters on this site have a great take on footy and I enjoy reading their opinions, especially if it's different from my own, Frankie and Poppa being a couple of examples... While I don't always agree, they almost always present a different view which is important to value and respect.

  • Whatever it is you don't like, i am happy as it has kept you  shut up you sanctimonious virtue signalling stooge.

    • Randy is right on the money here, all EAM does here is attack people and put people down, this blogs hillarious coming from such a toxic poster lol

      • SeS, I'll defend myself or someone else when needed. Unlike some, I don't come here to put people down. 

        You call me a toxic poster. Please. I think anything you don't agree with is considered toxic. 

    • Virtue signalling? Ha, na mate, I  always back my statements and opinions. 

  • I honestly don't notice all the sniping. Whenever a thread goes off topic and becomes personal I skim straight past it. 
    My observation of this site is it tends to the negative. Parra win 50 - nil and there'll be a thread about how BA didn't use the bench properly or that the Storm would have won by 60. 

    • That's a great assumption mutts, but don't forget, some are subconsciously trying not to get their hopes up as to make what they assume as the enviable fall softer, but who couldn't blame them? Been a while lol. Not their fault.  No doubt Arthur has done well. Some good improvements with a few younger players coming through. 

    • I'm the same Muttman. I hate it when you see a blog with multiple pages, at first you think, "oh.., this might be a good one..." then you just find that it spiralled out of control with abuse.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Yeah Man replied to LB's discussion New favourite emerges for Jonah Pezet
"We don't need to release Lomax for Pezet media don't know our cap situation"
7 hours ago
LB replied to LB's discussion New favourite emerges for Jonah Pezet
"I think he would be ok but he is primarily, particularly in open age footy been a Halfback. Where Pezet has played 6 in QCup as well as FG."
9 hours ago
Longfin Eel replied to LB's discussion New favourite emerges for Jonah Pezet
"Iongi. He will need an upgrade or he will be ripe for the picking for other clubs."
9 hours ago
Sonic Boom replied to LB's discussion New favourite emerges for Jonah Pezet
"Sanders played a bit of 6 here with us coming through. He has a really good running game. I think he would be fine playing 6"
10 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax or Pezet. Vote 1
"Us ....Fans are the Poor Bitchs whom need Saving
Or Mr Magtterson, "
11 hours ago
fishbulb replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax or Pezet. Vote 1
"Lucky Jonah. Does that mean we have a Mary Magdalene too?"
14 hours ago
Kurupt - Porn Addict, But I'm In Control replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax or Pezet. Vote 1
"Let's see a winger or someone that could replace Moses in the future?"
15 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax or Pezet. Vote 1
"Considering the fact Pezet or the chances of him getting here are hear not there I deal in reality who exactly is here."
15 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax or Pezet. Vote 1
"Jonah Pezet...Mitchell Moses...Did your mum read you the bible or did you grow up in a chook pen?"
18 hours ago
Cumberland Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax or Pezet. Vote 1
"Huh ? What you blabbing about Bro"
18 hours ago
Cumberland Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax or Pezet. Vote 1
"Lomax - Don't need a 6 as we have Joash Papalii but Eels need a winger "
18 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax or Pezet. Vote 1
"LOL...how about bold allcaps size-boosted with an exclamation mark...... YIPS!."
18 hours ago
HKF replied to Anubis's discussion NFL Superbowl LIX Continuous thread
"Along with those stats I mentioned above purdy is also more accurate than Jones. With adjusted (drops taken into consideration) completions percentage purdy is 2nd this year with Jones 11th."
18 hours ago
HKF replied to Anubis's discussion NFL Superbowl LIX Continuous thread
"The rams are stacked, they could Win the superbowl. "
19 hours ago
BEM replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax or Pezet. Vote 1
"Yipps for a couple of games?
You're hilarious 😂 "
19 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax or Pezet. Vote 1
"Fishy, I just realised our halves pairing may be a couple of stone cold Old Testament characters. Jonah and Moses. None of this Hillsong TimmyMannah prosperity cult crap. Old Testament, Home of Fire, Brimstone and Smiteing thou's fucking…"
19 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>