Replies

  • For those who continue to suck off BA, please see the below FACTS and please explain your unwaivering support of this coaching clown.

    1. Sit 8th by a miracle 12pts -23 F/A

    2. Worst defence in the comp -296 points.

    3. We’ve won 6 lost 7 but let’s see who we’ve beaten and where they sit on the ladder.

    Panthers 10pts, played them back into form a few weeks back, sitting in 14th currently.

    Saints 10pts lost 5 on the trot, sitting in 13th

    Dogs 6pts, running dead last 16th

    Tigers 12pts, playing like bustards coming 10th

    Sharks 16pts, decimated by injury when we played them round 4, sitting 6th currently.

    Rabbits 20pts, decimated by injury and origin last week, sitting in 2nd currently.

    Now in all honesty, looking at the above FACTS, how anyone can claim that we are going ok so far beggars belief. Only a complete nuffy with zero idea of rugby league could state otherwise. We’ve only beaten sides below us in the ladder or sides not able to field a competitive side and depleted because of injury/origin.

    We are going like bustards and tbh, only a few more bad games away from sliding down the ladder to where we rightfully belong. BA will not turn the side around any time soon, I just can’t see it.

    • Combine that with our stats last year that were the worst in the clubs history, its just diabilical that this man still mas a job.

      Theres zero accountability at the club, even after a bullshit review nothings changed.

      Wheres all the unicorn dopes who argued what great results we'd have this year because of it?

      • The whole review finding came down to the conclusion that it was Corey Norman's fault we were running dead last.

        Worst defence last year, worst defence this year.

  • Our form so far is like having fallen from the Sydney Harbour Bridge having avoiding being killed on impact, not been eaten by the sharks and not drowning we've found a bundle of $1000 to spend on booze, coke and hookers.

  • We won't stay there unless our defence improves. And could even win another spoon.

    Because all 19 wooden spooners, from 2000, have all been in the bottom four defensive teams - and at the end of R13 we have the 2nd worst defence in the competition.

    Our defence is now worse than last year (conceding 22.7ppg versus 21.7ppg) when we won the spoon.

    In round 6 we were coming 5th and had conceded 97 points (16.2 ppg). The best start since 1986 with the 3rd best defence, and 2nd best attack. That's where you have to be to win a premiership. Since 2000, 15 out of last 19 grand finals were won by top 3 defences (14 of those are top 2), or the top 3 attacks with reasonable defence (Cowboys 2015, Tigers 2005, Penrith 2003, Knights 2001).

    The wheels have fallen off. And we are now a long way off the pace.

  • It really ain't looking good going forward. WTF is wrong with this club. Year after year it's the same thing over & over. We change coaches, we change players, we even change the board but the same result. What the hell is in the drinking water in Parramatta. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH

  • 9 lives gone. Thank you Tigers 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Bourbon Man replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"In fairness, I've been guilty of poor conduct in the past. I'm now making a point of not doing that anymore."
2 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"HOE, it's possible for attacks on ideas to be attacks on people. It can be a fine line. But we can test the line. The test is to ask if the premise of an attack relates to some aspect of the identity of a person making a claim, or to the…"
2 hours ago
Bourbon Man replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Couldn't agree more Daz. 
Not wanting to make it sound political, but, this is what the "right wing" / "real Australians" / "non-politically correct" / "anti-woke" crowd carry on with. They shit can everyone they don't agree with and when they get…"
2 hours ago
Bourbon Man replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"On the topic of moderation, there's something I think needs to be absolutely spelled out.
In a perfect world, we wouldn't need moderation because we would all be responsbile enough to engage in robust debat, sometimes quite vigorous debate, possibly…"
2 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Bourbon Man, I'll go even further than you. Way before Covid, because I've been on 1EE for decades, it became absolutely impossible to keep track of the very personal attacks on me. Now, apparently, because I have stated clearly that I don't think…"
3 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Daz, appreciate the response mate and you expressing your position.
I still would like to understand why NOS claims you launched "very personal attacks" at Muttman.
Muttman and you both definitely vigorously debated/argued (as above).
No doubt,…"
3 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"NOS, I received a message from HOE, noting you had made this accusation I see above. HOE was clearly suggesting I should address it and if I had made a "very personal attack" upon Muttman (as accused) then I would be held to account. 
I replied that…"
4 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"NOS, before we get onto all the questions and claims you've raised, one by one, please let's start with your claims of Daz's "very personal attacks" on Muttman. 
You may be completly correct, but please provide evidence supporting this claim.
 
 "
4 hours ago
Bourbon Man replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"NOS, Muttman and I have been members of this forum for the better part of 20 years. 
I completely respect him and often compliment his considered judgment. 
On one occasion, out of frustration, I reacted to his regime of agendered negative…"
4 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"TolElls, Set up a new Averillo blog if you want to discuss it. I'm not going to reopen a blog closed by moderation. Hopefully, people keep it relatively civil (as much as possible) or drift horribly off topic and it will stay open and no posts will…"
5 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"Well if those above JRcant get the players he needs, what choice does he have, he needs to have 30 players. "
5 hours ago
Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Wtf, which blog was this in?"
5 hours ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Hey HOE,
I have a question.
So, Daz & a few others attacked Muttman with very personal attacks a few weeks back, he has since left the site which is a massive loss.
For some reason, those attacks from Daz, Bourban Man and others seemed to slip…"
7 hours ago
TolEllts replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"Admins, Why can't we reply to Averillo blog? What bad will it do the forum of the Eels executives and R&R team if Eels fans are venting their frustrations about the recruitment which unfortunately are contributing to the bad results in the field.…"
7 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
""
7 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"At the same time he still has a percentage to meet in terms of how much the cap needs to be spent whether he likes it or not.
So if it is like "This player wants $400k and we have $900k available" well he has to spend that money anyway.
So the issue…"
8 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa on Wednesday
Views: 241

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>