Does anyone know much about stamp duty?

The timing couldn't be worse. I've just reached settlement on my first property and did intend on making it an investment. I've paid stamp duty but due to corona everyone's spooked and I can't find someone to rent it. I'm thinking of I might as well just move in myself. Does this mean I get a refund on stamp duty as I would then meet the criteria for the first home buyers assistance scheme?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • don't know about that but if you move in and make it your primary place of residence for more than 6 months then even if you then rent it out and claim negative gearing you may not have to pay capital gains if you sell - used to be that way - you would need to get proper advice

    • Thanks mate.

       

  • I know that itis the duty of a stamp to see your mail arrives safely at it's destination.

     

     

  • OK so you are playing the tax game to the max.

    Buy and own property for investment but rent elsewhere.

    In the current environment you have certainly landed in a shit heap.

    If it was me and living in the house for next 12 months or so was not too difficult then do it.

    Vacant for more than 60 days and any insurance you have on the investment/rental property is non existent (uninsured)

    Here's the next scenario - IF you are umlucky enough to find a tennant to move in, in the near future, after a week or so they claim NO RENT because of employment due to Corrona virus and you cop it up the arse.

    As for stamp duty I have NFI.

  • First Home Owner Grant should apply to you. There are a couple so check your eligibility.  Visit Revenue NSW website and go to Grants.  Assuming you are eligible, you must live in the home within 12 months of settlement for a period of 6 months minimum. If land only, you need to build a house ( I think within 2 years of settlement). Of course, if you keep as an investment then your are not entitled to any exemption nor concession.  Best bet, check the Revenue NSW website 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Acme replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"V'Landy's sincerely cares about Lomax's mental health. He (rightfully) sees it as his responsibilty to give regular, personal updates to the public on Zac's mental well being, as he does for all players. Thank goodness we have a genuinely thoughtful…"
1 minute ago
Clintorian replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"That won't stand up in court, and everyone know's it's just a PR exercise, so they can play that game if they want to. No one is buying it."
51 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"The mental health issues which Lomax might be going through are basically due to his own decisions and the advice and support of his legal advisors and player manager."
1 hour ago
Mallee57 replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"Lots of people including lots of elderly visit the sick in hospitals and do it quietly without looking for praise or applause. Highlighting what Lomax did maybe once orca few times has absolutely nothing to do with his error in judgement and the…"
1 hour ago
Clintorian replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Ryles 2.0: 2026 gets off to a bright start in Eels trial
"I get the succession plan and why Tago played, my point is based on the fact that we've struggled in the wing position for the last few years, so why are we investing in small guys that don't make the metres and don't offer much speed?
Shouldn't we…"
1 hour ago
SuperEel 22 replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Ryles 2.0: 2026 gets off to a bright start in Eels trial
"Neither Kelly or JAC were playing yesterday. That's why Tago started. I didn't mind Alameddine. He did good ruck work and when given some room he seemed fast enough to take advantage of it."
1 hour ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Its not surprising this is unfolding this way, the NRL is desperate for a competitive team in AFL heartland. Its not an anti Parramatta conspiracy, its bias and annoying but this is getting blown out of proportion. Take a player that makes us better…"
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"$300K could help pay for an elite junior to be developed by the Eels over a number of years to be NRL ready and then immediatley poached to another club. mmmmmmmm"
2 hours ago
Axel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Yeah, but one of the women is paying for his divorce LOL"
3 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"Zach will eventually get back into the nrl, no one hates him it's just a bigger issue in the game. These contracts are useless and storm trying to benefit from it. Eels need to get proper value in return."
3 hours ago
macybrown replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Yes Nitram, Nrl do think all fans are stupid suckers...think they showed this couldn't care less attitude to fans,back when they changed NRL GF time slot.
and obviously in their blatantly shown attitude towards this issue re support what is clearly…"
3 hours ago
The Badger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"The answer to your last question is, yes they do & they don't give a toss about the intelligence or viewpoint of fans. 
Thus this pathetic open for all Origin change.  If it ain't broke don't fix it!"
3 hours ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Great point Nitram. Like i used this anology with my mates, like saying a bloke got caught having an affair on his wife with two women. His wife took the kids and left him. Then have his mates come out and say "He's a great bloke and did all these…"
3 hours ago
macybrown replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Im not surprised that mental health issues were raised in relation to Lomax, but Im very much astounded that it was raised not by zacs manager or by some alias on line reporter, but V’landys (whom supposedly should be a neutral party in this).…"
3 hours ago
Nitram replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Exactly my point. Just because you are sad doesnt mean you should not suffer the consequences. Our society functions because of repercussions regardless of how they make us feel. If not then the world quickly becomes a lawless free for all.
This…"
3 hours ago
LB replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"Yeah nobody is actually saying Lomax is a terrible person. He is making bad choices and the choice to try and pressure Parra to release him is not a great move. Great people can do some bad things, that is human nature.
What irked me the most from…"
4 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2075

 

V'Landys on Hello Sport

Happy Monday, if anyone wants a good laugh to start their week, skip to 32:50 mark and listen to this f***wit talk. It is laughable seriously. Claiming the offer of $300k was a great deal and we can put that into our junior system. But said we can…

Read more…
8 Replies · Reply by Mallee57 1 hour ago
Views: 746

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>