Cameron Ciraldo rejects Wests Tigers

Well they cannot catch a break can they, he toured the facilities, was offered a 5 year deal which rare at the same stupid from the club as it gave Ciraldo security. Still he said no. Well all knew the chances of him rejecting them was massive and slim to him actually going to Concord. Ivan Cleary obviously talked him out of it, with some inkling that he maybe the new head coach of Penrith in next few year. Talk is Ivan's health is not that great and he is looking to move into a 'Sheens' like role in the next year or two. Ciraldo will happily wait for an offer that suits him and Penrith he would take quick than the board can say 'Cam".

Though i do believe if say Melbourne, Roosters, Souths or even us came calling for example he would actually consider it. Where is with Wests there was some consideration but heavy doubt. If one of the big clubs called i think doubt would be small. Hell i even think if a club came calling that he was keen on, Ivan would move into a role and the board would push for it also to keep Ciraldo.

 

Anyway, just some NRL news to start your morning. Who will be coaching Wests in 2023? Warriors even? Canterbury? I think GC and Newcastle will be looking for new coaches also.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • It will probably end up Farrah.  To be honest , I don't care and suck shit to Ice for going there . Hope he enjoys his extra couple grand a week. 

    • His Mrs will thats all that matters nowadays.

  • Interesting on Sunday Footy Ch9 they brought up hypothetical of BA to Tigers as a development coach and Ciraldo wanting Eels job. All 3 reporters did not expunge the thought that Ciraldo wanting Eels

    • Tigers who has the big bods to chase the collision would be great for BA. It's skills and individual brilliance that they lack.

       

    • I'll drink to that 

  • This reply was deleted.
  • They suggested last week on 360 that he will hold out for a team that isn't at the bottom of the ladder. I wonder who that might be?

  • Wests tigers need to move Campbelltown full time 

    as for coach I think BA will suit them , they be happy of getting to the finals & dropping out after week one 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Perpetual Motion replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R15 v Raiders: Response or Reward? (W15-12, Gritty)
"He is a space cadet. Ryley gives us so much more."
8 minutes ago
Parra_Greg replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R15 v Raiders: Response or Reward? (W15-12, Gritty)
"All the arguments and negativity....apologies guys what a WIN GO PARRA ....one thing we may fight and disagree a great night"
27 minutes ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R15 v Raiders: Response or Reward? (W15-12, Gritty)
"Sanders showed tonight he has a long way to go still. He was average at best."
54 minutes ago
LB replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Should we keep Kelma?
"Issue is, he is playing well lately, but also playing for a contract. If you can have him on a 1 year deal, sure why not. But on a long term deal could be a risk."
55 minutes ago
JC replied to Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug's discussion DISGRACEFUL REFEREEING AGAIN!!!
"The touchy called that one."
1 hour ago
Angry Eel replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Should we keep Kelma?
"Totally get where you're coming from. I can't help but think how good he can be when he wants to. "
1 hour ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Should we keep Kelma?
"I understand where your coming from Angry but I still think we'd be better off using that roster spot for someone who will take that opportunity and prove they belong. He has a poor commitment level and professionalism."
1 hour ago
D_STOFFBERG replied to Angry Eel's discussion 3,2,1
"3 iongi, 2 Volkman, 1 kelma"
1 hour ago
Eels95 replied to Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug's discussion DISGRACEFUL REFEREEING AGAIN!!!
"The forward pass one was a deadset disgrace.  I was in line with it. Went back 2m"
1 hour ago
Richard Jackson replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R15 v Raiders: Response or Reward? (W15-12, Gritty)
"Oh my beautiful boys....a win!  But getting punished by ziggy relentlessy with 6agains but alas none for us, our defence won us the game. and wthout a goal-kicker in the side. What about our 1st try. Samrani can do that, always surprising the…"
1 hour ago
Joel K replied to Angry Eel's discussion 3,2,1
"3 iongi
2 Williams
1 Volk and B Kelly"
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to Angry Eel's discussion 3,2,1
"3 Points - Canberra Angels, didn't give away one 6 again all game. Special mention to Ricky Stuart and his face after the loss. Priceless
2 Points -  Eels 63% Completions with 8 minutes to go , kept inviting the Raiders Back into the game. The…"
1 hour ago
Angry Eel replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Should we keep Kelma?
"Some fair points there. If he's cheap enough is he worth using as depth in the middle though "
1 hour ago
HH - Love You Iongi Time! replied to Angry Eel's discussion 3,2,1
"Ionghi 3
Kautoga 2
Kelly 1
Honourable mentions to Edwards and Williams
 "
1 hour ago
Will 5150 replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R15 v Raiders: Response or Reward? (W15-12, Gritty)
"Great result... well done lads, gritty and scrappy at times but some massive heart in defence... kudos.
Iongi... quality. The pass for the Kit Kat try, just wow.
Kit Kat... great.
Samrani... big potential there.
Kelly and JDB often maligned... but…"
1 hour ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Should we keep Kelma?
"Absolutely not.
Let another club spend coin on him. Had half a dozen good games in 3 seasons 
We have Sua and Williams who will be in the conversation for best backrow pairing in the comp next season.  Kautoga pushing them both. Samrani should start…"
1 hour ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>