Replies

  • OMG I really wished this was the case.. It's so sad to think that he was glossed over for one of these latte options cry

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Parrafan101 replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion To many rumours
"Pezet and maybe a forward. Idk hopefully."
7 minutes ago
LB replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion To many rumours
"Talk is they won't announce til November 1? If so I wonder if they will announce a whole bunch of signings on November 1? Well I hope so as Ryles said they are back training November 3"
26 minutes ago
Titan replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"Love Peter Vs leadership, stay strong and ban them all. Especially Clinton Schifcoski ..... for pushing contracted players to break contract . Let's see who has the balls to move to R360 now"
46 minutes ago
Parramatta Tragic replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels 10th on the list for missed tackles in 2025
"lol....hope you enjoyed your swim in the Styx this morning
 "
52 minutes ago
The Badger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"So if a player agent advises some player not to go to R360 then by the way it's written, having advised them in any capacity, should be banned for 10 years. 
That's totally weird."
57 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"It's optics. It's years down the track before a potential former R360 player's contract might be on the table for the ARLC to approve. If R360 happens and if V'landys is still there."
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"Yeah that is a grey area. Say Papenhuyzen leaves in 2027, he is a free agent that's his choice and he is free to go. Someone like Lomax is in the harder spot."
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"The thing that could help the NRL is them putting a number on it. Instead of banned for life it's 10 years."
1 hour ago
Shawn peters replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"Who cares"
1 hour ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
""
1 hour ago
The Captain replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"Yeah people are confusing "won't hold up in court" with "illegal".
Non compete has a high legal threshold so it's really hard to enforce. So these rules may be impotent. But they're definitely not illegal.
At best these rules act as a deterrent. At…"
1 hour ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"He'll make that in 3yrs in Japan and R360 rugby"
1 hour ago
Muttman replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"The NRL can set its own rules. However it can't stop players signing with R360. That would be a restraint of trade. But the NRL is within its legal rights to determine who it registers and who it does not. So by all means sign with R360, but the NRL…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"Yeah true. Lee Hangipitalis was on SEN saying they can't do it, then brought up why just R360 not Union or AFL even? 
Thats why I was doubtful, but they've done it and I'm all for it. More likely players will try to sue the NRL to let them in but as…"
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"Longfin, yep. Contracts could be rejected on whatever goobley gook. We'll see.
The ALRC gave a reason for Izzy:  He Failed the Character Test.
 "
1 hour ago
The Captain replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"Restraint of trade and non-compete are legal in Australia. They're often flimsy and super hard (sometimes impossible) to legally enforce.
But this idea that restraint of trade clauses are illegal in Australia aren't correct. Basically every employer…"
1 hour ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>