ABC NEWS By Emma Elsworthy

Several people walking past a large ship, as the Sydney Harbour Bridge can be seen in the background
 

The Australian Border Force (ABF) has confirmed it received a concerned phone call from the state port authority about the Ruby Princess, hours before the cruise ship was due to dock.

Key points:

  • The Ruby Princess has been at the centre of a blame game between the ABF and the NSW Government
  • The ABF maintains NSW Health cleared the ill-fated vessel to dock in Sydney
  • The vessel has been linked to hundreds of COVID-19 cases and 15 deaths

The NSW Port Authority contacted the ABF in the early hours of March 19 and expressed "concern in relation to the health of the passengers".

The ABF said in a statement today the cruise ship was cleared to dock by NSW Health.

"The ABF officer made internal enquiries and subsequently advised the NSW Port Authority that the vessel had been cleared by NSW Health," an ABF statement said.

A report from Nine newspapers said the ABF officer instructed a Sydney harbour master to allow the ship to dock.

The ABF clarified it "did not seek to shape or influence any view or decision by the NSW Port Authority".

"This is not ABF's role," the statement said.

The Ruby Princess has been linked to multiple clusters of coronavirus cases in NSW and interstate since its 2,700 passengers alighted the ship without proper isolation protocol in place.

Fifteen deaths and at least 600 cases of COVID-19 have been officially linked to the cruise liner, meaning it is the single biggest source of coronavirus infections in Australia. 

 

When asked about who bore culpability last month for the ship docking in Sydney, NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian responded, "all of us have to take responsibility".

But on March 25, ABF Commissioner Michael Outram said the NSW health department had given the green light for passengers to disembark, despite several people on board being tested for coronavirus.

"The Department of Agriculture officials advised my officers that NSW Health had conducted a risk assessment, had rated the risk as low and that health officials would not be attending the vessel," he said.

"As a result of that information, all of the passengers were given a green light to disembark."

Earlier this week, NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller announced the commencement of a criminal investigation into the communications and actions that led to the ship's docking and disembarking.

 

More than 30 officers from State Crime, Counter-Terrorism and Special Tactics and Marine Area Commands have begun investigating the Ruby Princess debacle.

Investigators will interview high-priority witnesses in coming days, but they urged those with relevant information to contact Crime Stoppers.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Current system selects for turkeys who can't see the big picture but mindlessly follow technicalities. Often the cause big stuff ups when the technicalities are out of context.

    Let me guess the applied their risk assessment algorithm and got low risk and the guidelines said no intervention. Never mind that any fool who stood back and looked at the big picture could tell that this was high risk. This was late in the game and well known that cruise ships were coronavirus incubators and if one was positive then many were. And that it was likely that one was positive.

    • You are correct WEC.

      When I was at work and people said 'when we ran a risk assessment", I would automatically ask can I see it.

      Usually, it meant, there wasn't one and they made the decision in their head.

      Secondly, if they did show there is usually many flaws due to it being quite simplistic or the indicators are weighted incorrectly or it was just a tick and flick exercise.

      Thirdly from a professional point of view, they properly haven't even asked the right question. In other word did they first look at the threat or they haven't collected data and spoken to people at the coal face. 

      I could go on and on, but I will leave it at that. 

       

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"They're fucking hairplugs
 "
7 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Hoping Beach and Sarantinos are made of sterner stuff than their forebears. They seem up for it
 "
23 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Your take is so wrong Clint, I am listing hereunder a direct quote from the clubs advice via Mathew Beach;s statement of Parra commencing legal action!
“Our coaching staff, players, Members and fans would not expect us to consent to the release…"
24 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"No-one wants to eat raw fish off a hairy smelly aussie who will stand up & walk out in the middle of your meal"
27 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Okay, my take is that the Storm know this, and they can't have it drag out otherwise they lose out on him joining during Strom's pre-season, and a delayed court case will cost them more than he's actually worth, so they've tried to bring in the NRL…"
1 hour ago
Parra_Greg replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Sound Analogy Randy.....hahahaha"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"All I know is Parra need to win this case the bigger picture needs it.You would like to think this is an open and shit case but I feel the devil is in the details and fine print.
Hope the fine print goes in our favour there's big picture…"
1 hour ago
Flow Basket replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Japan please give Zac a job"
2 hours ago
LB replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"There is a very good chance Melbourne just leave it, not worth their while. Yeah they have gone far enough as it is now, but  as you said they are not giving up any players, they have given up enough.
So therefore it is a simple "Well we cannot…"
3 hours ago
Codswallop replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Lomax!  Sneaky, snake in the grass. Could nor trust him to not burn your toast. "
3 hours ago
fishbulb replied to GM's discussion Not Smart…JAC
"Abby dabby doo!"
9 hours ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"The Storm are delaying things. They dont want him enough to swap a player. Next.
The longer it goes on the worse for Lomax. Especially if he is paying his own legal fees."
10 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Riders of the Storm"
10 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"They might just call BA and try to turn the validity of his original contract into the issue and question that...Did we break some verbal assurances made by Bushy? 
That may be a better fight for them, the slippery pricks,
If it does happen, Acme…"
10 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"and how long should they run back? 3 mnths?"
11 hours ago
LB replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Or Lomax was swayed by the amazing scotch fillet Mrs Arthur cooked."
11 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1997

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 280

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>