Replies

  • A true labor man to the end!!! It’s a shame his dead but the timing is impeccable.

    • LOL, did he plan it for the election?

  • This reply was deleted.
    • I am a bum then. No way will I vote for a party that wants a death tax or one that has always sent us into massive debt.  We are now in surplus.  Sorry, but cold day in hell would I ever vote for a party with Bill Shorten as a leader.

      • lucky for us you will be in the minority come Saturday!!! 

        • We will see. Everyone gets a vote.  PS, We are now in a budget surplus, tell me when that happens with Labour? 

        • You were saying Brad?  LOL

        • Brad. If you thought BS was going to be PM then I strongly question your intelligence. If there has ever been a leader of one of the main parties that has about as much charisma as roadkill, then he is it. I can’t believe that anyone thought that the majority of Australians would vote for him. I have no party preference but Scomo won me the easiest 100 bucks ever. Candy from a baby lol. Pity I gave it back to the TAB yesterday.

           

           

      • Mate, (Electric Eel) We are not in surplus.
        Please, do a bit of research before you shoot your mouth off in public.

      • We are not in surplus! Frydenberg in his budget speech, remembering a budget is only what you project will happen over the next 12 months, said we will be in surplus but that won't be proven until next year. 

        Anyway, this blog is about the passing of Bob Hawke. RIP, Bob.

  • Feck what a shit way to reference the death of a former PM and a great bloke.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Coryn Hughes replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"We need to nail them on Thursday then stick the dagger in and recruit more talent in a position of need to really kick home the advantage.
I hope Jim and Matthew the club & its members aren't satisfied and we kick on and really make the most out of…"
6 minutes ago
Richard Jackson replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Anguillidae you've laid it out exactly as it was. Good stuff."
7 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Blue Eel's discussion The last of the BA Era.
"Bluey, good blog. This is an probably an unpopular opinion...
We tried to offload Matto. We couldn't. There are 7 months left chewing say $350-400K of cap space.
We just honour the contract (like we expected Lomax to) and look after him as best we…"
11 minutes ago
Parrafan101 replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Why when parra have info to make Vlandys lose his job and reputation and can put the game 10 years back."
14 minutes ago
Parrafan101 replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Parra have enough information that could possibly put the NRL and storms exposed which this could possibly or potentially start a war and a super league like comp being form."
16 minutes ago
Rabz S replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion We win the count case weget $250.000 of the storm
"No, the money goes to wherever PARRA paid the legal fees from."
18 minutes ago
Rabz S replied to Blue Eel's discussion The last of the BA Era.
"Didn't he recently get another concussion?
Surely medical retirement is on the cards now."
18 minutes ago
Rabz S replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
""
20 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"It's also interesting Paul Crawley stopped writing about this for Foxsport (he was voraciously pro-Eels, anti-Lomax) as soon as V'landys broke his two-week plus silence. After that, they all were written by Steve Zemek or the generic Foxsport team…"
41 minutes ago
LB replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"I find it hard to believe that would have been enough to get deal done."
45 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Folks, We defeated the Storm and HQ, who would've probably registered Lomax's Storm contract if it weren't for this legal action. But a 1-2 year read-down was highly likely as I've noted numerous times.
If R360 starts in 2028, how long will Lomax be…"
49 minutes ago
Axel replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"I find it hard to believe that Matterson passed the Bellamy test.  "
49 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions — It's Over Folks Before Main Hearing Begins
"A TKO win. As clean as you could hope for avoiding a messy bloodbath. A settlement that foreshadows the likely read-down. And just like that, the elephant has left the building."
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Yes.  It could be that the Storm have agreed to sign Lomax for 2 years and then he can negotiate without any restrictions on his 3rd year with any club.
 "
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Well its obvious Matterson will not play another game of nrl. He obviously wants to take this years coin and call it a day. 
Moving to Melbourne is just an excuse "
1 hour ago
Anguillidae replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"That's an interesting concession. There must be something else coming our way for us to agree to that..."
1 hour ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2145

 

The last of the BA Era.

 It has to be discussed dosnt it. Now that Zac can't play NRL for the next 2 years, unless the Eels are compensated, I'd like to move on and discuss the elephant in the room.By all accounts the Eels have tried just about everything in the last 2…

Read more…
2 Replies · Reply by Hell On Eels 11 minutes ago
Views: 90

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>